£4.99 (Kindle) £10.65 (Hardback)
Respected naval author Iain Ballantyne recently published Hunter Killers telling the incredible, true story of the Royal Navy ‘s submarines confronting the Soviet Union.
The story starts in the aftermath of WWII when the RN was applying lessons from captured German submarine technology, pushing to give diesel submarines (SSKs) greater underwater speed and endurance. Meanwhile the, then backward, Soviet navy was embarking on a race to become a naval giant which would see it fielding a vast and fearsome array of submarines by the mid-1980s. The author neatly paints in the political and historical backdrop to operations without hampering the flow of the submarine stories which will keep you gripped. While the world was often focused on the superpower space race, a more exciting, secret and ultimately more consequential duel was being fought in inner space. As submarine-launched nuclear weapons proliferated during the 1960s, NATO forces aimed to track and record as many Soviet submarines as possible. The Soviets built ever-increasing numbers and varieties of ballistic missile (SSBN) and attack subs (SSNs). The RN and even the US could not hope to match the sheer quantity but were far ahead in technology and in particular, the quality of the crews. The technological edge was largely maintained until undermined by the 1980s through the work of naval spy rings in the UK and the US. Also weaved into the narrative is the development of the RN’s submarines. From the first nuclear powered HMS Dreadnought, followed by the Valiants, Churchills and the world-beating Swiftsures. Also the very efficient Polaris programme to get the UK nuclear deterrent to sea and a glimpse of the wide-ranging operations of the diesel Oberon class are covered.
Although the books They Come Unseen and the US equivalent, Blind Man’s Buff gave fascinating glimpses into this world of undersea duelling, being published more than a decade earlier, they lack the level of detail Hunter Killers reveals. The book is mainly based on the tales of a few key RN submarine commanders who talk candidly about their experiences for the first time. What is clear is that for most of the Cold War period RN submariners were effectively operating on a war footing, on occasions taking extreme risks in getting close to other submarines, operating in the Barents Sea and penetrating Soviet waters. The book details many amazing operations some of which were supreme triumphs as well as some near disasters. The collision of HMS Warspite with a Soviet submarine (1968) rolled her over to 65° and traumatised many of the crew. HMS Sceptre sustained severe damage in another collision (1981) which ripped off her forward casing and part of the fin. For all the publicity around RN submarines operations in the Falklands War, most submariners regard their exploits in Northern waters as more daring, demanding and rewarding.
Make no mistake, the constant pressure on the Soviet navy from the RN and USN not only acted as an ongoing deterrent against the use of nuclear weapons but helped win the Cold War. The intelligence gathered was invaluable in keeping NATO ready to strike back in the event of Soviet aggression. The Soviet response to Western superiority was to try to out-spend them, ultimately bankrupting and hastening the collapse of the Communist bloc. The book concludes fittingly with specialist intelligence-gathering Frigate HMS London, commanded by a submariner entering Murmansk for a friendship visit with the old foe at the end of the Cold War. The author was aboard and witnessed the ship having to take avoiding action to dodge a ‘friendly’ practice torpedo fired at the ship by a Russian sub! This book is a ‘must-read’ for naval enthusiasts and historians, it will probably become required reading even for serving personnel. There is no better book on the submarine aspects of the Cold War.
None detected since 1968? Well if any had been or continue to be ,the nation with the means to do so would keep this capability close to its chest rather than shout it from the rooftops. We must also bear in mind that now with nimrod gone the ballistic missile subs leaving their Scottish base are very probaly under observation by varous intelligence agencys either from shore and/or by covert sensors on the sea bed near by. Every noise they make and every signal they send will of of immense value and carefully logged. Perhaps blunting britains nuclear manhood?
JP, SSBNs do not send signals while “on station” or when they are travelling to or from their areas of deployment. At least they never used to when I served on them.
While on patrol on the doughnut or dreadnought at the end of the 70s we had a reactor scram , pretty normal for the doughnut, about 1 minute later we detected a resolution class SSBN on passive ,very close,won’t say where in any detail in case we are still stooging around in that area also when I was on an s boat mid 80s we had a very close encounter up north with a typhoon boat. Tore off our towed array plus stub cable. Supprissed you omitted it from your book,I,m sure MOD still have details
Having had the honour to serve in HM Submarines in the 50’s, I am saddened to see our Navy being emasculated by politicians who are lacking in both judgement and vision. I can only hope that our nation will wake up to the dangers facing us before it is too late. It is depressing to see countries such as China and India, have navies larger than our own.
Hi Andrew,
In regards to your comment, I am trying to track down what sub my father served on in the 50s. He is listed in personnel books as active 56-58 (Engineer Officers, Acting Sub Lt) but I cannot for the life of me find even a list of active subs during that time. I was wondering if you might have any leads or ideas, and be able to help?
I am trying to get a bigger picture of our father for myself and my little brother, and he has been gone 5 years this year.
We must not forget HMS Matapan D43 who was the worlds only surface hunter during the seventies, working with US and UK submarine partners, they kept the peace during the height of the cold war. Although much of the work done by this vessel remains secret, history will show her as a joint US and UK project which kept the world safer on her watch. Freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.
That is interesting, Jim James. Matapan was the first RN ship I set foot on, in 1966 when she was part of the mothballed fleet. It was a on a “show around” when I was in basic training in Raleigh. I joined submarines in February 1967 and reverted to GS in 1972 so I never realised she had been commissioned and brought into service let alone converted.