In an announcement made this week, the MoD has said the RN will deploy a substantial force of vessels to patrol areas with vulnerable undersea critical infrastructure in cooperation with other nations. Here we look at the context of this action and what this may mean in practice
On 28th November Defence Ministers from the Joint Expeditionary (JEF) nations agreed to activate a ‘Response Option’. This will take the form of a Royal Navy-led effort to bolster the security of undersea infrastructure and deter hybrid threats. Since the destruction of the NordStream pipeline in September 2022 and the attack on the Baltic Connector pipeline in October 2023, there has been increasing concern about underwater Russian activity. The Defence Secretary described this as “This historic and unprecedented agreement”. It is certainly been a long time since the UK conducted multi-lateral military activity in the European area that was not done under the auspices of NATO.
The JEF construct
The JEF was formed in 2015 by Northern European nations and its principal geographic areas of interest are the High North, North Atlantic and Baltic Sea region. It is a construct intended to respond to military, security or political challenges and operate across institutional boundaries in the domains of Maritime, Land, Air, Space and Cyber. It is not a pact with obligations like NATO and is intended to complement the alliance which is the bedrock of European security. JEF was able to include Sweden and Finland which were outside NATO initially and can react rapidly and flexibly, particularly to grey-zone or malign sub-threshold activity. It has no standing forces but there is constant dialogue between members and regular military exercises are held using NATO standards and doctrine as its baseline.
Russia is inevitably the main threat to JEF nations and preventing interference with subsea pipelines and cables is exactly the kind of scenario it was intended for. The members agreed in June 2003 to actively share tactical intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance data as well as pool and share capabilities in this domain.
Taskforce?
The MoD says from December a “task force of six RN ships and an RFA, supported by an RAF P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft based at RAF Lossiemouth will patrol the seas around northern Europe”. The activity will cover a large area including the North Atlantic, North Sea and Baltic. To describe the RN’s contribution as a ‘task force’ may be slightly misleading for some people who might expect this implies a great force of warships sailing in company. In reality, the surveillance work will partly dovetail with other pre-planned missions and the ships will mostly be operating independently. Monitoring activity at sea is routine naval work and keeping an eye on Russian ships of all kinds has been a task for European navies ongoing since the end of the Second World War.
To some extent, this is a political and signalling exercise, designed to demonstrate the unity of the JEF nations and concrete actions in response to the pipeline attacks. It should be noted that UK government has at least, been proactive and taking a lead in countering the very real and very serious threat to undersea infrastructure with this deployment and the purchase of RFA Proteus.
In total around 20 European warships will be involved but the most intensive patrol will be in the Baltic Sea. HMS Richmond sailed from Gothenburg on 1st December and will lead a contingent of ships in the Baltic sent from Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Sweden. These states do not have major warships but Sweden will provide two of its Visby-class corvettes.
HMS Somerset is the other major warship earmarked for involvement. She has returned to Norway and was in Stavanger this week. It is understood she should be receiving the Naval Strike Missile soon, possibly delivered directly from the factory in Kongsberg. A senior source has said that bringing the Maritime Offensive Strike System (MOSS), in the shape of NSM, into service is a key priority for the RN.
Minehunters HMS Cattistock and HMS Penzance are included in the seven ships of the task force. 40-year old HMS Cattistock has just completed a major LIFEX refit that will see her serve into the 2030s and has been working up from her Portsmouth base. HMS Penzance is due to decommission in the near future as the penultimate Sandown class SRMH left in RN service and this tasking may be her final duty. As we have observed before, mine hunters have much utility beyond mine warfare and their hurried demise in favour of autonomous systems is going to leave a substantial gap.
Patrolling the waters around the UK is routine work for HMS Severn and HMS Tyne, the two OPVS allocated to the operation. HMS Severn is frequently employed as a platform for young officers to conduct navigation training but the two tasks are not incompatible. These two ships will likely be sent to the North Sea although they have occasionally been deployed well beyond the UK EEZ in the past.
RFA Mounts Bay is already in the Baltic, having recently completed participation in exercise Freezing Winds with the Finnish Navy that concluded on 1st December. She is not an ideal ‘patrol vessel’ but like any ship at sea, can contribute to the surveillance of the area around her and has Royal Marines and landing craft embarked. Her well dock would also be useful for deploying UVVs that could investigate underwater activities.
The RAF Poseidon is well suited to the task and can keep watch on a large area, cueing ships to investigate vessels of interest. The recent TV documentary featured coverage of a Poseidon crew monitoring Russian vessels acting suspiciously close to North Sea pipelines. The main issue for the Poseidon force is lack of numbers, with just 9 aircraft it cannot provide a persistent presence, given the number of missions and huge areas it has to cover. Support from other allied ISR assets as well as satellite imagery and AIS tracking data can all be compiled to build up a picture of maritime activity. This is nothing new but there will be a greater emphasis on monitoring undersea infrastructure.
Into the grey zone
The most obvious question about the JEF response option is how will the mission work? If a warship encounters a vessel (Russian or otherwise) in international waters, stopped and acting suspiciously over known cables or pipelines what action can they take? It may be quite difficult to discern or prove that malign activity is in progress. Interference with subsea assets can potentially be carried out from quite small vessels and a team of divers in shallower parts of the Baltic. The Russians have a wide range of options, from dedicated surface ships (such as the RFS Yantar) that deploy submersibles to specialist nuclear submarines such as the RFS Belgorod equipped with mini-submarines for entirely covert operations.
Even if the ships of the task force have UUVs that can be deployed to inspect the seabed in the immediate area, it may not be simple to discover if the vessel of interest is merely surveying the installations or is actively preparing to damage them. Assuming hard evidence of interference can be obtained, then it becomes a matter for higher authorities as the Rules of Engagement (ROE) are unlikely to allow for attempts to board and certainly not the use of force. It becomes a matter of intelligence and evidence gathering so at least the activity will no longer be deniable. No one has been able to prove who conducted previous attacks which have been the subject of controversy and misinformation, increasing the difficulty in dealing with it at a political level. (Unsubstantiated theories as to the culprits include the Russians, the US, Ukraine and even the UK.)
How long the RN can sustain 7 ships at least partially involved in this mission, remains to be seen. Unfortunately, the Multi-Role Ocean Surveillance ship, RFA Proteus, specifically intended for this task has taken longer to enter service than anticipated and is not available yet. She has to complete Operational Sea Training and will have to return to Cammell Laird shipyard in January for her 5-yearly dry docking and inspections that are mandated under DNV class rules.
Protection of Critical National Infrastructure will be a mission where success looks very unspectacular and has the potential to become an eternal task for navies. Infrastructure carrying billions of pounds worth of data and energy supplies are only going to become a more attractive target for any adversary wanting to conduct a campaign of harassment below the threshold of armed conflict or for all out destruction in time of war.
Is this to deter the Americans blowing our infrastructure up, or to prepare the ground for the false flag attribution of a world wide cyber attack in 2024!
Eh?
Definitely
It’s nice to know that I’m not the only one who knows how the world really works though there will be no false flag as there’s a new boss in town
The tin foil sales in your area are at an all time high I see.
Exactly
My thought exactly!
Sean, ATH, and Rick.. so you’re still in the Russia did it; easily led, ill informed, believe in the pandemic, AGW and voted Remain camp! You want to get off the MSM, and wake up
And like all conspiracy theorists you jump to conclusions without any proof.
Whereas science shows manmade climate change is happening (AGW), the pandemic did clearly happen (a close friend lost his father, a doctor, and a brother to Corvid-19).
And finally just to show how foolish your conclusion jumping is – I campaigned for Brexit as I believe the EU to be flawed and untenable. I find Remoaners more annoying that conspiracy theorists, but at least they usually have rational arguments for their views even if I disagree with them. Whereas conspiracy theorists tend to be low achievers who use paranoia as a defence to avoid self-loathing.
Russia sabotaged Nord Stream and the earth isn’t flat.
As a healthcare professional who worked through the pandemic and who had an uncle who died of covid…please take this as constructive…you have no idea at all what you are talking about and it’s best not to talk BS around a pandemic that killed 5-10 million people world wide…
On the lookout for US navy ships to prevent a repeat of Biden attack on nord stream 2.
The tin foil sales in your area are at an all time high I see.
“WASHINGTON — New intelligence reviewed by U.S. officials suggests that a pro-Ukrainian group carried out the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines last year, a step toward determining responsibility for an act of sabotage that has confounded investigators on both sides of the Atlantic for months.”
Pro ukrainian means the Military Intelligence directorate or HUR-MO
Germany also believes the same
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html
Washington Post says a bit more
“THE DISCORD LEAKS | The CIA learned last June, via a European spy agency, that a six-person team of Ukrainian special operations forces intended to sabotage the Russia-to-Germany natural gas project’Thats close ally would be Germany and that was the proposed plan at the time before it happened
“The European intelligence report was shared on the chat platform Discord, allegedly by Air National Guard member Jack Teixeira. The Washington Post obtained a copy from one of Teixeira’s online friends.”
If you believe the Ukrainians did it, then you’ll believe the Americans put a man on the moon. This was a West job.. Biden and Nuland announced as much.. You’re reading US deflection, especially when it comes from the CIA Backed WP
Please get your facts right.
The Bilderburgers own the WP, the Illuminati own the NY Times,
the Murdochs are the Aussie Lizard people.
And we all know the Saxe-Coburgs are run by the Templars.
Route surveillance is perhaps the one sphere where building a complex hull solution would pay.
Interesting, looks like the Spruce Goose, but isn’t there what MPA for?
Below was a really useful plane
Company Plans To Build New PBY Catalinas – AVweb
.
That’s flying so low it reminds me of the ekranoplan.
That’s what it is
Boeing Pelican, based on the Wing In Ground concept
Not fast enough and too small for deep ocean work….
:large
I want one.
A problem with the map. The Czech Republic and Slovenia are NATO members.
Apologies. Fixed
Cannot even copy and paste properly!
What did you do to attract all the trolls on the site today?
Poor NL, you seem to have attracted the cream of the conspiracy theorists with this article
Hopefully you can make sure they can’t come back? They add very little to discussion
Except comedy value
Ukraine would love your map.
Do any of these vessels have repair capability if any cables or infrastructure are targeted. Seems crazy not to have the ability to repair.
Repair would be best done by the owners of the infrastructure. They will know what’s required to fix and will bring in specialist vessels to do it.
The two obvious countries missing from the JEF nations construct are Germany and Poland, would seal of the Baltic nicely.
With ref to airborne persistence, would have thought that our MQ-9Bs would be prime candidates for this tasking along with any other large drones – Global Hawk etc from other member states.
The commentariat on here is an interesting reflection as to why this is necessary.
There *might* be an unholy alliance of the anti western keen in gently stirring the pot in as many places as possible.
Russia was delighted with the Middle Eastern mess and would love as many other messes as possible to draw attention away for its big Ukrainian mess.
The problem is that the threat of another mess means resources to screw the lid on that one. And this is where the slim resources problem is. Not enough frigates. So if we gave 2 x precious T23 tied up doing this they are not doing another tasking.
One of the benefits of the mess in the Middle East is that the IDF can draw on US munitions held in Israel. Previously these stockpiles were being drawn down to support Ukraine. Even if Russia didn’t nudge Iran to get Hammas to launch the attack, Russia has benefitted.
Likewise Maduro is, like any dictator, is looking to deflect domestic discontent by appealing to crude nationalism and may make a land-grab for most of Guyana. If so, this could only benefit Russia further if sanctions are placed in Venezuela or if Guyana is supported with weapons.
Feels like we could see a lot of unrelated fires breaking out globally…
Sadly I tend to agree on the ‘unrelated’ fires fuel by ‘gifts’ from China who are testing the West’s resolve for their own ends.
My concern is that they may try the Taiwan grab shortly.
I would be unsurprised if Chinese ‘fishing’ vessels turn up down South and ram the RN guard boat……accidently like….
China still hasn’t the depth to dominate the Straits and achieve Sea Control. The US only has to achieve Sea Denial and they have enough to do that. And now they are working on their short comings like reducing their AShM deficit, building more F35, newer BVR AA missiles coming on line and the USAF proving JDAM against moving targets the longer the Chinese leave it the more secure Taiwan becomes. The USN carriers would operate to the east of the island. F35 could be sniping at PLAAF and PLAN aircraft whilst they were still feet dry over the Chinese mainland. Giving every adult Taiwanese an AR would help too…………
I never know how to read Taiwan.
My Taiwanese neighbours dont think much of the US sabre rattling and the Taiwan defence budget as a portion of GDP is way below little Singapore. So I think the Taiwan government wants to continue the way it is- which is thats theres is only one China, and let westerners tie themselves in knots over that
If Taiwan spends too much on defence, China will attack before the balance starts to move in Taiwan’s favour. If it doesn’t spend enough, China might consider it ripe for the plucking. It’s a fine line to tread.
Both sides nominally agree there is only one China. They only dispute which is the legitimate government. The reality remains unspoken.
I think they want to continue on as they are. And the US is driving the situation.
What drives PRC is more Taiwan’s position than anything cultural.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-67282107
The US is quietly arming Taiwan to the teeth
They would do that wouldnt they… guess where the weapons come from
BTW its Singapore not Taiwan thats armed to the teeth and they are more like Ireland in their location- away from trouble
Singapore was well over 3% of GDP – before it became a tax haven so its current GDP is inflated by multinationals book keeping that isnt ‘real’ for their economy. A major streaming service I use really is based in US but my credit card shows a Singapore entity while the servers are different again. Same with Uber. But of course much larger businesses route internationally traded resources worth colossal sums via Singapore marketing entities
The PLAN is now larger that the USN..it’s got around 100 large surface combatants, 100+ smaller surface combatants ( 1000-3000 tons..it’s throwing out 8 new large surface combatants a year..it has around 70 electric boats…30 of those are ocean going and as good as anything anywhere…the USN will not manage PLAN it will be invited into a mutual blood bath that china thinks it can recover from quicker…the only thing the USN now outguns china on are carriers…..which china does not need as many off as it will be fighting on its front door for the first bloodbath campaign….after the first campaign china is planing to follow follow with a world war that will drive every economy into the group …..for which china has been preparing and Harding its economy and the west has not…it thinks it can win and a fair few serious minds now think they can as well..read Babbage..it’s an eye opener.
The west is heading for the biggest kick in the head since WW2 and if it’s lucky it wins a 2-4 year long war that’s shatters it’s economies and kills millions of people…if it’s unlucky it’s will to fight will collapse and it will need to seek terms ( china thinks the west will collapse its thinks it’s populations will not take the pain and it’s politicians will capitulate when faced with something like WW2j.
Really? But you never believe that any Hypersonic missiles will work or anti-ship ballistic missiles will hit anything except slow-moving buildings? So why worry so much about Taiwan?
Agree, although the evidence is china is looking at a 3-4 year ish timeframe for Taiwan…that’s the point it will be at the high point of its power…it will have 30 odd more large surface combatants commissioned and have a few more navel bases ready ( gulf and both sides of the Atlantic)…it’s also got a tad more hardening of its industrial supply lines and economic hardening.
Maduro land grab? Just sent some JEF ships down there, that will fix it, and don’t say I have not told you.
The JEF is for the high north and Baltic. If you check a map you’ll find Guayana is in South America.
You couldn’t be more inaccurate if you tried.
You mean this 1896 Map but no longer Britains problem
Not entirely sure why we need 2 × T23, the Russian SM threat in the Baltic is small (1-2 kilos). Anything coming g in from the North/Norwegian Sea comes in on the surface. As the threat escalates, so too can the response.
By far the most useful vessels are the minesweeper, for investigating seabed anomalies.
This is basically constabulary work at the moment, we need lots of OPVs patrolling, backed up by persistent air coverage to help with the RMP. Like I said, large drones would help immensely.
An interesting take.
I agree that vessels that can look downwards would be more than helpful. Which is why I’m a bit surprised the Rivers are there….we have previous few minehunters left?
The fact the T23s are there tends to suggest that SSN’s are present?
Not sure of the Kilos Rov capabilities, believe that most of the activities in this area are believed to have been conducted by Russian shipping of varying types.
This is realistically requires specialist sonar equipment, surveying work. HMS Scott/Enterprise and RFA Proteus are obviously the vessels of choice for the UK, if ever available.
Might have been a good job for the Echo class.
I totally agree.
The Echos would have been far-more use than the OPV’s – they had proper sonar fits.
I think Poland would fit better into JEF than Germany, although I admit my view has been more than a little biased through a post-Cold War historical lens. If Germany has shed the remnants of ostpolitik and is willing to move quickly (and it’s the latter that I query possibly even more than the former), fair enough. JEF exercises for rapid deployment.
It feels like Germany wants to spend time in considering its options. Nothing wrong with that; wars aren’t won by the first echelon, and equally you can’t have a second echelon if you don’t have a first. There’s room for both.
I think that Germany may well still have a ostpolitik hangover. However, they are involved in other areas, such as the ESS initiative where they are a major player.
Would be nice to get all the ducks in a row, but perhaps like many others finances are limiting involvement across the board?
“the attack on the Baltic Connector pipeline in October 2023″
This is silly Daily Mail nonsense.
https://www.euronews.com/2023/10/25/finland-blames-chinese-ship-for-baltic-sea-gas-pipeline-damage
Maybe this information form 25 Oct hasnt sunk in yet ?
A vessel that works the northern sea route, and therefore highly likely has a Russian crew…
They are various flags, unlikely a Chinese flagged ship doesn’t have Chinese crew. Anyway a pipeline is a small item that is only aprrox located on marine charts with a fairly wide restricted zone, that the anchor broke exactly the right spot is absurd. Why didn’t they just blow it up like the Ukrainians did on nordstream
Ukrainians, hey?!
Next you’ll be blaming them for the Great Fire of London…
The evidence of US and Germany points to that direction and made public by major sources. Even that dude in the Air National Guard intelligence node released the raw material predicting the Ukrainians would attempt it. As for me I have no idea but usually reliable media with contacts in intell do ( plus the unauthorised leak)
Ostpolitik is certainly dead with the German political class.
But elsewhere in German society is a different matter.
It’s certainly a fair point to say the Baltic Connector damage has been conclusively shown to have been caused by the anchor of a Chinese merchant ship. Whether it was incompetence or deliberate is less clear. Either way, you have to ask why are the JEF nations so concerned that this task force has been constituted now.
https://www.politico.eu/article/balticconnector-damage-likely-to-be-intentional-finnish-minister-says-china-estonia/
Either way, you have to ask why are the JEF nations so concerned that this task force has been constituted now.
NATO has an advantage in surface seapower. There is a narrative to maintain. And so establishing a task group is something they can be seen to be doing. Plus it is Europe seen to be exercising agency.
It is the seaborne equivalent (with much much less evidence) of sending a QRA flight out to ‘intercept’ Russian MPA.
Whoever blew those pipes committed an act of war.
Either way, you have to ask why are the JEF nations so concerned that this task force has been constituted now.
There is no JEF task force, all 7 ships are from the UK.
And they are not doing anything specific patrolling on behalf of JEF except when they happen to be around the area.
JEF is all just willy-waving
All 7 of the 20 ships.
I didn’t say that. Note the italics.
This is china testing the west…you don’t accidentally drag the bottom of the occean with your anchor..and every civilian bit of Chinese infrastructure and capability is part of the CCP.
Granted Russia is the one everyone is concerned about for obvious reasons but I thought Ukraine admitted it was their own intelligence services who destroyed NordStream 2?
They are not capable of doing it. And why would they risk upsetting Germany?
Whoever did it committed an act of war.
No they didn’t.
It was Operation Cold Turkey. Cutting off supplies of the drug and making us eat uncooked Christmas dinner for our own good.
Didnt cut off supplies . The predominant piped gas supply is the overland routes through Belarus and yes Ukraine ( who get paid and use the gas too)
However LNG from northern Russian terminals still arrives – but is much more expensive and has to have ‘different pronouns’ to disguise it origin
What is the point of JEF now that Sweden and Finland are joining NATO, except for another talking shop for the UK?
An extra group operating within the geopolitical area of NATO rivaling for attention by the UK.
NATO already has NRF, the big countries within NATO are not interested in JEF, the USA, Germany, France Poland, Spain, and Italy.
Is JEF going to counter Russia all by themselves without NATO? Deploy to the Balkans, Falklands islands, and Somalia? What will it do when the chips are down?
The JEF is a NATO initiative, announced at the NATO 2014 summit in Wales. It’s part of the “Framework Nations Concept (FNC)” where Germany, the UK and Italy act as framework nations for groups of Allies coming together to work multi-nationally for the joint development of forces and capabilities required by NATO.
The U.K. led FNC is called “JEF”.
JEF is geographically aimed at the Baltic and the High North, so no, it won’t deploy to the Balkans or Somalia. Will it counter Russia all by itself? Possibly, but not for long. It’s about rapid deployments. Given that the article is about a short notice twenty-ship JEF deployment, I find it odd that you ask whether it’s another talking shop. Clearly not.
The JEF concept was first conceived in 2012 and announced by the then Chief of the Defence Staff, General Sir David Richards. The JEF arose from the Joint Rapid Reaction Force (JRRF) which disappeared as a result of the UK’s focus on operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.
What is the added value to NATO?
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/chief-of-the-defence-staff-general-sir-david-richards-speech-to-the-royal-united-services-institute-rusi-17-december-2012
And was then internationalised and folded into the NATO FNC structure.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/indispensable-natos-framework-nations-concept-beyond-madrid
Presumably you no-longer think JEF is a “pointless talking shop”.
What has it achieved since? Did it stop any gas lines or internet cables from being damaged?
As with terrorism, the terrorists only have to succeed once, whereas the good guys have to succeed every time.
It’s easy enough to knock the police if a house is burgled, but not credit them for all the burglaries they’ve either deterred or prevented.
No internet cables have been sabotaged, you can’t expect them to prevent accidental damage. As for Nordstream, well the Russians blew up their own pipe-line.
That is a made up claim about Nord*stream. There is very credible evidence from multiple sources of high reliability published that Ukrai*nes security forces were involved.
For me the clincher was the stuff released by the US Air National Guardsman who gave out ‘raw info’ from the US intell system that Ukrai*ne was planning something like this ( this was unknown at the time of the blasts). The germans had confirmed this after the events by following the breadcrumbs as the sabot*eurs operated from their Baltic coast.
And plenty of credible evidence that the Russians did it, including the big insurance claim they lodged for it.
Some links please. …’Plenty’ must mean exactly that beyond Red Tab stories
Is shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted,
Like BoJo saying about Corona, sorry but suck it up.
What stable door? Is any of our critical undersea infrastructure down? The answer is “no”.
So what are those ships out there for when they cannot do anything to prevent accidents and stop the Russians?
That’s like saying traffic cops are pointless because they don’t stop accidents and ignoring the dangerous and reckless drivers they stop. You clearly don’t understand the concept of “prevention”.
Stuff needs to be done. What do you care if it’s done with a NATO hat or a JEF hat, especially given JEF is NATO (re)created? I think you are asking why this is under JEF and not NATO, right? Two reasons: first these NATO frameworks are open to non-NATO countries. We all know Sweden will be NATO, but it actually isn’t yet. Second, working with 10 countries is easier than working with 30.
Is more pointless bureaucracy led by the UK, the Empire has long ended,
Let’s create more groups for Southern Europe, the Balkans, and the Caucasus.
If you try reading the previous comments about the purpose of JEF first then you might avoid writing such obviously ignorant posts.
Just a thought…
It is still a pointless bureaucratic talk shop with only UK ships,
So who does the other 13 ships belong to?
Given its not only U.K. ships, 7 of the 20 ships are from the U.K., it shows your opinion is based on a failure to grasp the basic facts.
Another task, pretty much the same old resources.
2 Frigates, 2 MCMV, 2 OPV, 1 LSL.
Question, if this is to be sustained what portion of the deployable RN does this represent?
On Paper about 9% but in reality probably 20% at current deployable figures.