The civilian ships of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary are a relatively ‘low profile’ part of the surface fleet but they are critical in providing the RN with the ability to stay at sea for extended periods and many other additional capabilities. An examination of the RFA flotilla in 2015 reveals a small and rather threadbare collection of ships. Like the RN it serves, it is doing its best with what it has in anticipation of the arrival of new vessels.
Of its thirteen ships, half of them are antique vessels dating back to the 1970s and at the time of writing, only eight of them can be considered fully operational.
Uncertainty over the future of several vessels and their hoped-for replacements maybe resolved in the defence review later this year. At least 3 RFAs (RFA Mounts Bay and Fort Rosalie & Orangeleaf) have been alongside unable to put to sea during the last 18 months due to lack of engineers. The RFA is experiencing similar problems to the RN, competing for technical personnel against well-remunerated opportunities in the offshore hydrocarbon, wind and renewable energy sector as well as regular merchant navy jobs. RFA Orangeleaf is due to go back to sea in September 2015. RFA Fort Rosalie has begun her reactivation and will replace RFA Fort Austin which has just returned from a spell in the Gulf. It will be interesting to see if sufficient manpower can be found for RFA Mounts Bay to join the annual ‘Exercise Cougar’ deployment later this year.
In June 2014 work began on construction of RFA Tidespring, the first of 4 new Tide-class tankers to be built in South Korea. This project is the only remnant of the ambitious original ‘MARS programme’ to fully regenerate the RFA flotilla. They will be the first new replenishment vessels the RFA has received since 2003 and they represent a vast improvement over the older ships they will replace. Designed by British company BMT, the 37,000 tonne vessels are built to modern double-hull standards with highly efficient propulsion and automation. They have also been designed from the outset to re-supply the QE aircraft carriers with engine and aviation fuel as well as some solid stores and ammunition. The Tide class will also benefit from good self-defence weapons and have large flight decks and hangar facilities. RFAs are routinely performing tasks previously done by warships and embarked helicopters are a critical aspect of delivering that capability as well as vertical replenishment (VERTREP) duties.
Tidespring, is due to arrive in the UK in early 2016 where she will be fitted with refuelling and other equipment by A&P Falmouth. She will be followed by her three sister ships at six-monthly intervals. The entire cost of this four-ship programme is around £500M and although building these ships abroad has caused a storm of controversy, it is hard to argue with the value for money and speed of delivery offered by the South Korean DSME shipyard. These four ships will effectively replace RFA Gold Rover, Black Rover and Orangeleaf. It seems likely that despite being relatively modern, lacking a double hull protection for her oil tanks, RFA Fort Victoria will also be retired when the final Tide class vessel is delivered around 2019. It should be noted that five RFA tankers have been scrapped in the last ten years, all without replacement.
Both over 30 years old, RFA Diligence and RFA Argus offer important specialist capabilities and an announcement about if and how they will be replaced is much overdue. Diligence has done sterling service providing engineering support to RN vessels all over the world, particularly to ageing submarines deployed East of Suez. Discussions about a replacement have been ongoing since 2006 but nothing has been forthcoming. RFA Argus is a highly flexible helicopter carrier, aviation training ship and floating medical facility, few ships have offered the tax payer better value for money than the redoubtable Argus. Both vessels were originally merchant ships taken up from trade for the 1982 Falklands War and modern merchant conversions would again be a quick and affordable option for replacing both ships.
Solid stores and ammunition ships RFA Fort Rosalie and Fort Austin are also Falklands war veterans. Spacious, relatively simple and reliable they continue to provide useful service. It looks likely they will remain active into the 2020s when they will pass their 40th birthdays and also need replacing.
A&P Falmouth is contracted to maintain four RFAs and the other nine vessels are maintained by Cammel Laird in Birkenhead. These ‘cluster’ contracts have provided the MoD with good value for money since 2008 and the arrangement has been extended until at least 2018. It is encouraging to see that maintaining the RFAs helped breathe new life into the ship yards at Falmouth and Birkenhead. Cammel Laird, a once a great name in shipbuilding closed down in the 1990s but the stability provided by the RFA work has contributed to its revival as a successful ship repair business, now making tentative steps back into ship building. Political considerations maybe one of the drivers for spreading the work across the country but Devonport Dockyard, Western Europe’s largest naval facility is massively under-utilised and it would perhaps seem a more logical home port and maintenance facility for the RFA.
Snapshot of the Flotilla in July 2015
RFA Argus – In UK waters after returning from 6 months off Sierra Leone
RFA Diligence – Laid up in Birkenhead
RFA Mounts Bay – Not left Falmouth since 2013, in refit Summer 2015
RFA Lyme Bay – Deployed to Caribbean on APT(N)
RFA Cardigan Bay – Based in Bahrain providing long term support to mine warfare vessels
RFA Fort Austin – In Birkenhead after returning from 9 months in Gulf
RFA Fort Rosalie – Refitted 2014, in Birkenhead being reactivated to replace her sister ship
RFA Fort Victoria – Refitted 2014, supporting coalition warships in Gulf and Indian Ocean
RFA Wave Knight – Completing refit in Birkenhead
RFA Wave Ruler – Refitted 2014, completed Gulf deployment June 2015, at sea in Atlantic
RFA Orangeleaf – laid up in Birkenhead, supposed to go back to sea in September 2015
RFA Black Rover – Duty FOST Tanker, operating in training role around South Coast
RFA Gold Rover – Refitted 2014, on her final deployment to South Atlantic, retiring in 2016
It could be argued that the shrunken state of the RFA simply reflects the reduced support requirements of the RN. But by 2020 there will only be eight vessels able to replenish warships at sea, (even including the two ancient Fort class ships) an inadequate number, even with a smaller fleet. Beyond its core replenishment task, the RFA is also in demand as a ‘force multiplier’ for the surface fleet. Single RFAs often carry out independent missions such as patrols in the Caribbean or like RFA Argus, serving off Sierra Leone. With such a lack of warships, auxiliary vessels have an increasing value. Perhaps our politicians and planners should be according almost as much consideration to the state of the RFA as given to the RN itself.
Related articles
- Latest Look at Next Generation RFA Ships (UK Defence Journal)
- Future Ship Concepts for Repair and Maintenance at Sea (BMT – PDF format)
- Good news on Royal Fleet Auxiliary tankers lost in controversy (Save the Royal Navy 2012)
- The case for a British Hospital Ship (Save the Royal Navy 2014)
I just left the RFA a few months ago after eleven and a half years as an engineer officer. The story from the inside is a sad one – chronic mismanagement, morale in the dirt and the engineers in particular are woefully under remunerated for the work they do. The service is being run off the edge of the cliff and the management are either unwilling or unable to make the changes necessary to stop the outflow of qualified and experienced engineers. I managed to get another job with more money, more leave, better ships and a far more convivial atmosphere and pleasant regime on board.
Tony,
still with the RFA and loving every minute of it. Those that leave think the grass is greener but only a few find better pay and better time off. You can get more time off but not many companies work a 4 and 3, maybe no good for a married man/woman but fantastic for a single life. Money isn’t the best but better than most. Although the company isn’t everyone’s cup of tea the majority stay with and enjoy the lifestyle.
What branch/rank are you Tony? There are some branches/ranks are very well paid for the job they do. However, the technical branch officers are not among them. The only seagoing jobs with less leave than the RFA are the cruise lines. Just about everybody else is 1:1. In terms of money the RFA has been slipping towards the bottom end of the scale. I know one engineer who was the same rank as me (2/O(E)) who left last year to work in offshore oil, is on 1:1 leave and will earn £110k this year. Another guy I know left the RFA as a 3/O(E) and went into a job on the yachts where he earned more than an RFA CEO. Another guy went onto the North Sea supply boats, a bit more money than he was on in the RFA but with 1:1 leave. In my own case I went from £42k with 4 on 3 off to £51k and 1:1 leave. I worked out in the RFA as a “band C” 2/O(E), taking into account my annual salary and the actual hours that I work in a typical week on board I was earning £23.50 per hour. In my new job it works out at £41 per hour. With less stress, better ships, better conditions and a far more convivial atmosphere and regime. If you get put on a course on leave or called back to a ship early from leave you go on double pay too. The problem is when an RFA engineer goes back to college for the first time after his cadetship to do his next ticket, he finds himself sitting in a classroom full of guys from the commercial sector who are earning more money, more leave and getting faster promotion. At this point the scales fall away from our RFA engineer’s eyes just as he gets the higher ticket that makes him extremely valuable and employable outside the RFA.
Bottom line is qualified and experienced marine engineers are increasingly hard to come by. The ones the RFA has are taken for granted and treated like dirt. Outside of the RFA there are umpteen employers who are prepared to pay a lot more and give a lot more leave to those same qualified and experienced engineers. Until the RFA can offer an incentive for those engineers to stay (hint: the £15k taxable and pensionable for a 3 year commitment we were offered in March is woefully inadequate) the service will continue to haemorrhage engineers.
No engineers means no ships available. No ships available means no RFA.
Hi Nick. Your comments ring true. I’ve just left one of the Fort’s after putting her alongside for a while (duration unknown) due to lack of Technical staff. It was sad indeed to see three ships in the same situation, another down south and yet another coming in next month.
DSME were insolvent when the Tide class contract was awarded to them, UK was lauded in the Korean press for saving the company.
It is now in serious financial trouble. Hopefully the ships will not end up as creditors’ bargaining chips.
DSME has now acknowledged bankruptcy and is seeking emergency funding. Watch this space.
DSME are not bankrupt. There are struggling due to drop in oil price affecting offshore construction. However they have the full support of a Korean state-owned bank and the problems will not affect the tanker construction project
http://www.janes.com/article/55656/dsme-to-receive-usd3-7-billion-bailout
I just hope you’re right. I cannot imagine the contract would have been given to a UK company in such a predicament.
The MoD also charters a commercial tanker the 35,000 t MV Mearsk Rapier.
It’s worth adding that the combined replenishment capability of the French, Italian and Spanish navies is only 8 oilers, and most of those vessels will be smaller and less capable than the new Tide-class, or even the Wave-class tankers, so in 2020 the RFA will still provide around 35-40% of Europe’s entire AOR capability. The RFA however does need more investment in personnel, and the 2010 cuts need to be reversed.
Does does anyone know what the delay is with TIDESPRING?
.
http://www.janes.com/article/58251/dsme-creates-risk-management-task-force HMMMMM……..
Now DSME are going on strike. Does anyone know what the situation is now with the overdue Tide class?
Just for info, the RFA Black Rover is currently moored along the dock road on the wirral. Apparently it is due to be decommisioned. Does this mean scrapped?
Seems to be a news blackout on the overdue Tide class. CEO of DSME has now been arrested.
The silence on the Tide class continues.
All rumours suggest it is RFA Manpower problem causing delay on delivery to UK, not a technical issue with ships. Tidespring has successfully completed initial sea trails. Other 3 ships continue on impressive original build schedule
If , even after the retirement of all the old tankers, and Diligence, the RFA still cannot man one new Tide class, the RFA must be experiencing a manpower shortage of crisis proportions.
http://www.janes.com/article/64617/first-mars-tanker-delayed-until-2017 The usually reliable Jane’s seems to have information that the problems are indeed technical. Imagine the howls of protest in the media if a British yard was responsible!
http://navaltoday.com/2016/12/06/second-royal-navy-tanker-rfa-tiderace-unveiled-in-south-korea/ So that’s it then, wiring problems!
I cycle past the Fort Austin at the docks here in Birkenhead. Been here a year or two after a £25m refit. What’s going on?
http://products.damen.com/en/ranges/logistic-support-vessel
Why dont we just buy off the shelf from Damen across the North Sea and agree for them to built under licence in the UK, perhaps at a non BAE yard or at their yard in Portsmouth or even better get them to open a yard in the UK.