Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Justin

A good investment… And clearly it carries out other work not in the public domain.

Ry@n

I think 2033 is closer than the MOD realise

John

That maybe the time it takes to refit here, we are talking about the MOD here and cost overruns guaranteed 😂😂

Phillip Johnson

I just love brass hats and politicians airily deciding to extend the life of old hulls. Always turns out to cost more and take longer than expected because of that lovely word ‘growth’. Fifty, fifty bet it will turn out cheaper to have bought another Oil Rig Support Vessel and a new generation of hydro equipment.

Irate Taxpayer (Peter)

Phillip

I totally agree. The best bet with HMS Scott would be to scrap it = right now.

What you forgot to mention is that we (i.e. UK) have two ex-oil rig support vessls now “in service”

Thus its replacement(s) is already in service!

If the working deck either Proteus or Sterling Castle were to be fitted out with a standard commercial-off-the-shelf towed / side-scanning sonar, then either one of those two ships could easily do the seabed survey task = starting immediately.

Peter (Irate Taxpayer)

DAVID GRAHAM

Peter,
I agree. However, please note it is Stirling Castle.

Regards,
David.

Irate Taxpayer (Peter)

David G

Fair Cop!

Peter (irate Taxpayer)

chris smith

Oi rig support vessels or similar would not have room to fit the extensive full width sonar systems including swell compensators and very accurate navigation gear nor the multitude of large computers that store data taken at 1 metre spacings widthways and lengthways across the seafloor at a 1 kilometer width that is used by submarines to navigate at speed with all active sonar turned off. HMS Scott is still needed. She is not a normal survey ship.