HMS Echo and HMS Enterprise are the Royal Navy’s hydrographic oceanographic survey vessels (SVHO). Designed to survey both coastal and ocean waters, they have also proved flexible and adaptable to a variety of other roles. Here we look at the history, design and service life of these two ships.
Background
In 1997 the Royal Navy’s hydrographic ships were repainted from white with buff funnels to ‘Pusser’s grey’ this reflected their increasing integration with warfare and utilisation for missions beyond surveying. Amphibious warfare and, in particular, submarine operations need support with high-definition bathymetry and atmospheric data, sometimes in near real-time and new ships enabled by modern data processing and communications technology would provide this. With ever-decreasing hull numbers, and declining manpower strength, the RN wanted its next-generation survey vessels to have a small crew and designed from the outset for other roles. The ships would need to basic self-defence capability and facilities to act as mine warfare logistic support and command ships as well as perform Humanitarian Aid and Disaster Relief (HADR) missions . While HMS Scott is optimised for specialist oceanography, the SVHOs have a greater all-round capability, designed mainly for hydrographic survey in the littorals and continental shelf.
In the mid-1990s the RN planned to replace its two remaining coastal survey vessels, HMS Bulldog and Beagle, and the newer HMS Roebuck, with three modern vessels that could conduct both ocean and coastal survey work. It was not until June 2000 that it was confirmed that two ships had been ordered from prime contractor, Vosper Thornycroft. The £130 million project included 25 years of through-life support and the construction of both ships which was sub-contracted to Appledore Shipbuilders in North Devon.
The hulls of both ship were constructed side by side in Appledore’s undercover dry dock and the lead ship HMS Echo was floated out into the river on the 2 March 2002, followed a few weeks later by Enterprise on 27 April. Echo was supposed to be completed by August but technical problems at the shipyard and issues with the new azipod propulsion delayed the programme. HMS Enterprise was accepted into service ahead of HMS Echo in September 2003 but her working azipods were removed in Portsmouth. They were donated to Echo in October 2003 so as to speed up her entry into service. HMS Echo formally commissioned on 7 March 2003 but was laid up temporarily in Falmouth awaiting a solution to her propulsion defects. HMS Enterprise was cold-moved to Plymouth, commissioning on 17th October while her crew trained alongside awaiting delivery of new pods.
Pods
Azipod propulsion was pioneered by ABB in Finland and by the late 1990s, the technology had matured to the stage that they were being fitted to a number of merchant vessels. In simple terms, the DC propulsor motor, directly attached to the propellor is hung from a pod below the stern of the ship. The pod is rotated to achieve steering and electrical power to the pod can be supplied from a generator cited anywhere within the vessel. This has many advantages over conventional shaftline propulsion arrangements. The principle benefits are fuel efficiency, vastly increased manoeuvrability, reduced vibration, simplification of machinery layout and elimination of shafts and rudders. Azipods were initially selected for one of the early iterations the Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft designs but later eliminated when they were found not to meet naval shock resistance standards.
Like the Type 45 destroyers, although a less high profile example, the RN took a modest risk by selecting an innovative propulsion solution for the Echo class ships. Unfortunately, the compact Azipods initially fitted to HMS Echo failed. One of their disadvantages is that unlike internal engines, they require expensive dry docking to remove them. ABB eventually paid compensation to the MoD but in the long run, the Integrated Electric Propulsion (IEP) and azipods have proved to be reliable and efficient, ideally suited to the work of the SVHOs.
In combination with the bow thruster, the azipods can rotate the ship on its own axis through 360º. In combination with the ship’s dynamic positioning system (DPS), the ship can maintain a stationary position over a particular spot to facilitate surveying operations such as taking seabed samples. Using the differential GPS fit, the ship can achieve a positional accuracy of 20cm while maintaining 6-8 knots. The azipods also considerably simplify berthing, making them the most manoeuvrable ships in the RN, besides the Sandown class minehunters.
HMS-Echo-General-Arrangement-1Power generation comes from three MAN B&W 6-cylinder RK270 Diesel-Generators with a total power output of 5.4MW, supplemented by a smaller generator, mainly for use in harbour. The PWM (Pulse Width Modulation)-controlled compact azipods are rated at 1.7MW along with the 0.4MW bow thruster. The ship can be controlled by a joystick, traditional helm or automatically via the DPS and integrated navigation system. The VT integrated platform management system (IPMS) controls and monitors power generation, propulsion and auxiliary plant, tank gauging as well as damage control functions and is accessible through workstations around the ship. There are very high levels of automation with the machinery spaces usually unmanned and generation capacity automatically brought on or offline, depending on the ship’s speed requirement. The SVHOs are not especially fast, with a maximum speed of around 15 knots, but have a good endurance of around 9,300nm at 12knots.
It is notable how much foreign content was included in the construction of these vessels. The Society of Maritime Industries says that typically 70% of the value of a naval ship contract is in the supply chain, while the construction of the ship itself is only around 30%. Based on a Canadian design, the Echo-class incorporate Finish azipods, Danish engines and Norwegian sonar systems. Prime contractor Vosper Thornycroft no longer exists, absorbed by BAE Systems (and their Portsmouth facility was subsequently closed). The Appledore yard where they were built closed in 2018. (But in August 2020 it was announced Appledore has been revived once again with a £7M investment from InfraStrata.)
Core mission
At the heart of the ships is the Integrated Survey System, comprising the Kongsberg Simrad EM1002 Multi-Beam Echo Sounder (MBES) which features a hull-mounted transponder beneath the ship. This is designed for comprehensive and rapid recording of bathymetric and oceanographic data. Additionally, the EM 1002 MBES is optimised for coastal waters down to 1000 meters The EM 3000 MBES is a very high-resolution seabed mapping and inspection system for shallow water. The more basic and EA 400 and EA 500 single beam echo sounders (SBES) are also used to measure depths accurately in shallow waters.
The ship can also deploy off-board sensors from the stern or starboard side. The baltic room has two hydraulic doors that open in the forward starboard side of the ship. A telescopic crane is used to lower payloads over the side of the ship which may include a bottom grab to collect samples from the seabed. To gather accurate data about the water column, sensors such as the conductivity, temperature and depth (CDT) probe, Sound Velocity (SV) Probe or Secchi discs to measure water turbidity (transparency) are lowered vertically. A large hydraulically-raised and lowered A-frame on the quarterdeck is used to deploy instruments towed behind the ship including the undulating oceanographic profiler (UOR) and sidescan sonars. A 2-tonne knuckle boom crane is also used to lift static sensors such as tide gauges out of the water or move survey equipment around the quarterdeck.
The modern survey motor boats, SMB Spitfire (HMS Enterprise) and SMB Sapphire (HMS Echo) are designed to operate independently from the ship for short periods, carrying a small group of surveyors for inshore surveys of beaches, ports and estuaries. They can transmit data directly back to the ship for processing.
Skilled hydrographers working on the Echo class ships, equipped with this wide variety of sensors can collect atmospheric, coastal and bathymetric data which can then be rapidly collated and transmitted ashore, potentially for immediate tactical use. More typically, the data is sent to the UK Hydrographic Office (UKHO) in Taunton for incorporation in globally-respected Admiralty nautical charts or disseminated for scientific use.
The SVHOs were build to Lloyds commercial ship rules and able to operate in a range of extreme climates down to -20ºC. Crew accommodation and recreational areas are comfortable, designed for extended periods at sea. All personnel share a double cabin with bunk beds and en-suite facilities, except the CO and XO who have single cabins. The SVHOs use the same 3-watch system used to crew HMS Scott, Protector and the OPVs. The ships’ company totals 72, comprising 13 officers, 21 senior rates and 38 junior rates divided into 3 watches. Two of thee watches (totalling 48) serve onboard at any one time, working a cycle of 75 days on, 30 days off. This arrangement gives the ships exceptionally high availability, able to remain operational for up to 330 days per year, subject to maintenance requirements. If there is a need to embark additional personnel, there is accommodation for 81 people in total.
Devonport is the home port for the RN’s hydrographic ships but their upkeep is done elsewhere and their constant activity sees them spend little time in Plymouth. Maintenance and refits of SVHOs were formerly done by A&P in Falmouth but in October 2018, UK Docks in Middlesborough was awarded a 10-year £150M maintenance contract for HMS Echo, Enterprise and Protector. HMS Enterprise arrived on Teesside for her first 6-week maintenance period in April 2019, followed by HMS Echo in May 2020. At various times, both ships have also undergone upkeep work while on long overseas deployments at dockyards in Gibraltar, Malta and Singapore.
A varied service history
Since entering service both ships have seen been deployed globally including survey work as far afield as the Indian Ocean, the Persian Gulf, the Black Sea, Antarctica and Norway. Both ships have served with EU Operation Sophia rescuing migrants in the Mediterranean, for which HMS Enterprise was awarded the Firmin Sword of peace. In April HMS Echo was deployed to the waters off Australia to join the, ultimately doomed international search for the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH 370. Echo was also employed in an unfamiliar fishery protection role in early 2016. HMS Echo was the first NATO vessel to arrive in the Black Sea in December 2018 after the incident in the Kerch Strait when Russian ships rammed and fired on Ukrainian ships before kidnapping the vessels and their crew. HMS Enterprise had also served in the Black Sea in 2018 as the flagship of Standing NATO Mine Countermeasures Group 2.
In 2019 HMS Enterprise embarked on a lengthy deployment to the Asia Pacific region which included a transit of the Taiwan Strait in December. Having returned to the Mediterranean, she was deployed at very short notice in August 2020 to assist in Beirut in the wake of the devasting explosion at the port. HMS Echo has been in UK waters, mostly operating from Plymouth since completing maintenance in Middlesborough in July 2020.
The average running costs (personnel, fuel and port visits) for these ships is about £5.5M per year. In 2013 the MoD put their Net Book Value (NBV – calculated by adding the cost of upgrades to the original capital cost and deducting depreciation) at about £25M each. It is clear they have provided the taxpayer with exceptional value for money and continue to be an important part of the surface fleet beyond their surveying function.
When originally completed in 2003, the SVHOs were intended to have a working life of about 25 years, so they could expect to be retired in 2028. This is consistent with the 10-year support contract awarded in 2018 but the MoD has not yet published official Out of Service Dates (OSD) for these vessels. With at least eight more years of service ahead of them, there is not the same urgency as a replacement for HMS Scott, but consideration needs to begin soon about how they will be replaced or extended in service.
You can follow the progress of these ships on their lively Twitter accounts @HMS_Echo and @HMSEnterprise
(Main image: ©Andy Amor – HMS Echo in the Solent, July 2020)
Needs at least 48 VLS cells. 🙂
They should be temporarily phased into acting as fisheries protection as this is more important for the UK in the near future. If countries need surveys of far away places then let them do it for themselves we barely have enough RN ships that we need this survey service , we no longer rule the waves. Use them where they most serve us.
Except survey work actually makes money for the country!
Plus as a globally deployed force the Royal Navy needs to have the latest information on more than just UK waters to ensure safe navigation.
Yeah and the RN are among the best on earth at Survey work, we have to keep this very underrated capability in the Royal Navy. They are vital and lots of big nations actually look to the UK for this data.
Does it! Wow!
It doesn’t make as much as fisheries will!
We sold our fishing fleets donkeys years ago to anyone who’d have them
You really think our fisheries would make a lot of money ??
Your deluded
some of those larger fishing boats would have been ideal for conversion into an ‘inshore survey squadron like the old wooden ham class sweepers echo,enterprise and egeria. based at chatham. but operating from the armpit of the nation(lowestoft). loved my time on o’ld echo’ 1n 1985 EVERY WEEKEND OFF! A CREW OF UNDER 30. ONE CHIEF, TIFFY , ME, A KILLICK STOKER AND A Stoker made up the entire engineering department for all three ships.
I recall one E boat, in 1981, had two brothers as cook and RO – the Radio shack door opened up into the galley! Yes, they were amazing ships to have as a draft- we worked out of Harwich when i was on them. Served on Egeria and Enterprise. They even had a combined senior rates mess with a bar! The coxswains in 1981 were all good guys, Bish Wark, Don Aves and a really good guy with a sort of baby face on Enterprise whose name I can’t recall. They were well equipped for wire wreck surveys and all had an 18 foot SMB. One E boat famously had a Wendy house of an enclosed bridge! Echo I think. The others had more manly – and wet and cold – open bridges – and the skipper, XO and cowswain die one in 3 4 hour watches witth the SR – but he was in an enclosed space behind teh bridge! The AB’s did one hours tricks on the wheel. They were not actually former inshore minesweeper, but Ham class hulls built as survey vessels from the start.
Yeah these aren’t exactly the best suitEd for fishery work! All our 13 mine counter ships are far better suited
3750 tonne steel vessel with high endurance against “plastic” MCM vessels.
The government have been quietly dumping Hunts just because they would be useful.
We will need them all.
Multi value ships,small but very vital. Do not put all your eggs in 1 basket .
A vital roll that we do very well in RN anywhere and anything.
Had a wonderful 6 months on Bulldog multiple tasks as MEM such as defecamant plant,tide watching, coxn of inflatable boat to Islands in the Seychelles
Yes the Navy allow the captain to troll off anywhere that takes his fancy..after all we have no world wide allies or even friends that we might help.
Let’s try and chase fishing boats….oh..we tried that when little Iceland made us look stupid in the 70s..when we actually had more than 5 ships. Safeguard our tiny fishing fleet from hundreds of trawlers with our equally small littoral fleet, both of them
How about put a 96 silo bank on the chopper pick up deck, and then lengthen the ship by 20 meteres at the back and put a hangar and landing spot on the back, then add bigger radar and a 5 inch gun on front with two 40mm guns on each side of the mid deck, and a couple torpedo tubes and sonar tail and we have a nice Warship… one can fantasise
Throw in a triple 16 inch gun turret whilst you’re at it
Nah 20inchers is more like it.
triple ee gads man wee you at jutland?
and dream. but they are substantial ships.
Anyway on a serious note, these ships make more money fir the RN than they cost don’t they, due to survey work and selling oceanography data. We should never get rid of this capability! But I wouldn’t be surprised if HMS Echo and HMS Enterprise are sold or scrapped… But HMS Scott might be more at threat of those fates sadly!!
Reference the “Droggy” photo. Admittedly doing this differently wouldn’t present much of a saving to the naval estimates, but does one workstation really need 5 keyboards?
Can the RN afford specialist survey vessels? The ‘Enterprise Class’ are dedicated survey vessels which when required can do limited other things.
Should the replacements be General Purpose vessels which can do surveying when required?
The Commercial world manages to do its survey and oceanographic work of the back of some pretty basic vessels.
These ships are likely carrying covert intelligence systems for listening to every thing from foreign navies to pirates cell phones to insurgents communications in places from Libya to Yemen to Somalia etc
That usually involves some rather specialized antennae. The ships has a good collection of domes which are probably communications but could contain anything. That however, was not really my question.
The RN is cash strapped and on the track record of British governments that could well get worse. Can it really afford the level of specialization evident in the current survey fleet or will it be forced in future to a common hull using containerized equipment to cover Survey, MCM and Offshore Patrol as required? A modern version of the old ‘Colonial Sloop’ if you like.
Specialised antenna for cell phone transmission ? You can fit a cell phone snooper in a brief case .Its not long range and satellite communications
Compare the antenna fit from 2003 for Roebuck in Iraq to the more modern picture of Echo at the top, proliferation of aerials not including the domes
Regarding a common hull, it would probably just be hull form and major systems with a different deck layout. Australia has some ideas on a common hull around this size for specialized survey and patrol vessels
“The new OPVs are intended to replace the existing Armidale class and Cape class patrol boats, Huon class coastal minehunters, and Leeuwin class survey ships in service with the RAN….
The design of the Arafura class OPVs is based on the Lürssen OPV80 platform. The compact design of the OPV offers enhanced seakeeping characteristics and superior performance….The OPVs will have a length of 80m, beam of 13m, and draught of 4m. The displacement of the vessels will be 1,640t. The ships will be manned by a crew of 40 members and will offer accommodation for more than 60 passengers.”
https://www.naval-technology.com/projects/arafura-class-offshore-patrol-vessels/
The latest Defence force update in Australia is now predicting 12 OPV’s and 8 MCM/Survey vessels completed between 2022 and the mid 2030’s to replace the RAN current small forces. These at the moment consist of the:
13 Armidale Class PB’s
4 Huon Class MCMV’s and
2 Melville Class Survey vessels.
The Update stated the extra 8 MAY be based on the OPV hulls. Question is whether 1680T is big enough for the more specialized tasks, but there does seem to be a strong push for commonality..
talking about multi tasking could something like this be a future for the archer boats?https://www.google.com/search?q=iranian+missile+boats&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjaksmSsN_rAhUKA2MBHYTMCpIQ_AUoAnoECBMQBA&biw=1266&bih=571#imgrc=gfMQJCZdFu-gZM
probably the most cost effective ships in the R.N
These ships represent remarkable value for money and the RN Hydrography is world renowned. No need to complicate or cut back here, just replace with the best available when needed.
Essential for the submarine service I would have thought. Having up to date maps while your driving round in a windowless tin can could be quite handy.
I would think that for a single sailor this ship would be considered prime duty.
I HAD THE HONOUR(?) OF SERVING ON THE PREVIOUS ECHO. PART OF A 3 SHIP GROUP TITLED THE INSHORE SURVEY SQUADRON THE LUCKY 15 OF US ON EACH GROUP, WITH EVERY WEEKEND OFF, A SKIPPER WHO WOULD ASK ME WHERE THE LADS WANTED TO TIE UP THAT NIGHT. OUR CHOICES WERE LOWESTOFT,LOWESTOFT AND ERRRRRRRRRRRRM LOWESTOFT. IN SUMMER WE GOT THE OCCASIONAL OFFER OF RAMSGATE. AS A LEADING STOKER, I WAS THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT for aLL 3 ships!!!!! i kid you not. shame they had to go. but the wooden hulls were on their last legs.
The question should be asked, by now the world’s oceans and seas plus coastlines, should have been surveyed and charted many times over, by different nations navies, government marine agencies, academic institutions or private companies?
Are these Royal Navy Survey ships really needed?
Short answer yes they are, they do very important work and yes they bring income into the country, from survey data and navigation charts sold too!
However, these vessels, should have secondary roles, for fishery protection duties plus coastal border protection too.
Why decommission when so short of hulls?Helipad for lilypadding chopper,can operate littoral/Green/Blue water,light guns.For perhaps £2 million or so , clip on 30mm/Martlet combo,bit slow but useful opv/patrol vessel for freeing up Batch 1 and 2 Rivers.Lots of jobs they could do,?