Warships of the European Union Operation ASPIDES are closely supporting the challenging salvage of the oil Tanker MV Sunion, still burning weeks after being attacked by the Houthis.
MV Sounion, carrying 150,000 tons of crude oil, was first struck by the Houthis on 21st August. Its crew of 25, comprising 23 Filipinos and 2 Russians were rescued the following day by a French destroyer FS Chevalier Paul. During the operation, the Houthis continued to harass ships in the area and the French destroyer neutralised a Houthi one-way attack USV. The rescued mariners were subsequently landed in Djibouti.
The Sunion had been anchored in the Red Sea since 27th August about 72nm west of Hodeidah, Yemen. Although the cargo is unlikely to explode, the fires are fed by the crude oil evaporating and could burn for months if not dealt with quickly. With temperatures over 400ºC recorded on board, there is the likelihood that the heat could weaken the steel structure of the ship and make it vulnerable to breaking up and releasing large amounts of oil into the sea.
The Greek Prime Minister has led the diplomatic effort behind the salvage with European nations, co-ordinating with Saudi Arabia and back-channels to Iran that provide most of the backing to the Houthis. The ‘Houthi Supreme Political Council’ says it will not interfere with the salvage operation having belatedly realised that the potential disaster they are responsible for would devastate their own coastal communities.
As a highly unreliable fanatics, it would be unwise to take the Houthis at their word. Their ISR capabilities have been degraded and while they continue to attack shipping in Red Sea, their ability to discriminate between targets is limited. Close naval escort of the salvage vessel is required.
On 14th September the Greek salvage team managed to successfully secure the tanker to the Greek tug MV Aigaion Pelago (main image above). The tanker is being towed slowly north, most likely to an port in Saudi Arabia.
The US Navy is rather conspicuous by its recent absence since the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower left the Red Sea in June 2024 and Operation PROSPERITY GUARDIAN was effectively reduced. Both the USS Theodore Roosevelt and USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike groups have been poised in the Gulf of Oman as a direct deterrent to Iran becoming further involved in conflict with Israel. However, it appears the Lincoln may now be heading for the Red Sea with destroyers USS Michael Murphy and USS Frank E. Petersen Jr.
There are also no Royal Navy warships in the Red Sea. Despite rumours to the contrary, HMS Duncan has not passed through the Suez Canal and is currently alongside in Limassol. Since she sailed from Gibraltar on 5th June she has provided air defence protection for the USS Wasp Marine Expeditionary Group. She has also exercised readiness to protect Cyprus from possible missile attack by Iranian-backed factions in Lebanon or support potential non-combatant evacuations should the conflict in the region spread further. If the RN was not currently so threadbare it is almost certain that at least one warship would be deployed to the Red Sea, in addition to the Mediterranean presence.
RFA Argus, returning to the UK from the Littoral Response Group (South) deployment in Asia and Australia, has been routed the long way around South Africa and arrived for a port visit in Cape Town this week. It is possible this was already planned but more likely something of an indictment of Western navies’ lack of resources and inability to secure the Red Sea sufficiently to allow the passage of an armed naval auxiliary.
It’s good that Argus isn’t wasting its long trip and is paying a visit to Cape Town. South Africa is a BRICS country and the more of those we can keep cordial and neutral the better.
It was futile and pointless from the beginning. If you want to change the Houthis behaviour the solution lies in Iran. At least in the middle east the current US administration has been a total disaster. They’ve given Iran everything they could ever have wanted in the expectation that they would modify their behaviour. All it’s done is to embolden them and the last 12 months have been the tragic result. The elimination of Soleimani showed the best way to change Iran’s behaviour. When they cause trouble punch them in the face and if necessary keep punching them in the face until they change their behaviour. It’s the only thing that has worked in the last 40 years.
Israel is the problem my friend, has been since 1948
I’m surprised you’re just whinging about modern Israel and not about iron-age Israel too…
Your over-simplification also overlooks the conflict between Sunni and Shia branches of Islam, extremism within these branches (Muslim Brotherhood, Al Queda, ISIS, etc) plus the plethora of brutal militaristic dictators; Gadaffi, Saddam, Bashar al-Assad, etc.
Only a complete idiot would blame blame Israel for all this too…
Judea 2000 yrs back wasnt the only area of conflict . Rome was a equal opportunity annihilator destroying Carthage and Corinth too. Maybe others .
You forgot one extremist group Wahabis- and their offshoots Al Queda, Muslim Brotherhood So Saudis are off your list ?
Dont forget Irgun, Stern, Haganah and Palmach. Is that because they were jewish ?
There was probably less conflict in Isreal 2,000 years ago, though for a period it was occupied by the Romans. Presumably you blame the Jews for that rather than the Romans…
Had you bothered to read my post you’ll see that I clearly cited Al Queda as a source of violence in the Middle East. But you’ve shown in the past the inability to comprehend posts before replying to them.
So does this means you’re backtracking on your claim that Israel is to blame for all the issues in the Middle East?
No I didn’t mention Irgun, Stern, Haganah and Palmach because you chose to talk about “since 1948”. All these organisations were active before 1948, at which point they were disbanded. Not good on dates either, are you?
I’m good on dates, you just cherry pick to exclude the terrorists attacking British interests in Palestine and after they left the majority population.
Terrorist and Politician and PM Begin
Theoden
I made exacty the same key points…
However I first made them in my post of the 14th October 2023 (here on Navy Lookout) – so just a few days after those first attacks by Hamas into Israel on the 7th October 2023.
Last October, I accurately forecast the future:
Thus, in that same post, I advocated putting a western carrier strike group (very visibly), directly off the coast of Iran = to act as a deterence against the Mad Mullahs thaking any further action.
Had that been done quickly, it probably would have destabilised the ailing Iranian economy = and thus brought their regime down.
Those comments were made one year ago.….
Since then, as we all know, there have been attacks by Iranian proxies all over the Middle East and North Africa – all of which have been stoked-up and supplied by the Mad Mullahs in Tehran
There have even been “border incursions” into Pakistan from Iran (whch I did not forecast)
However, only very recently has a weatern carrier strike group appeared off the coast of Iran (as mentioned by the editor directly above)
Thus, overall, the totally ineffective use of western naval power over the past year has meant that Iran – which was always the prime suspect from day one for backing the 7th october 2023 attacks – has (to date) got clean away with it.…
Regards Peter (Irate Taxpayer)
PS Why isn’t Gretha Thumberg campaigning about stopping this huge ecological disaster in the Red Sea …..or is it only me that thinks she is “strangly silent” on this topic these days?
in the first attack what did they hit the tanker with. It looks fairly undamaged to me, not even low in the water. So the only signs of damage are from the explosive charges placed on deck by the terrorist group to film a publicity stunt.
Their ballistic missiles often are just long range AA missiles with small warheads just fired in a ballistic trajectory
It caused a fire that the crew managed to put out, but resulted in engine failure. Minimal structural damage but no propulsion.