This week HMS Queen Elizabeth returned home from the Westlant 19 deployment to the US. She joined her sister HMS Prince of Wales alongside in Portsmouth together for the first time. Here we look at the new facilities that will support both aircraft carriers.
The arrival QEC carriers has driven investment of around £100 Million at Portsmouth Naval Base to create the Queen Elizabeth Class Centre of Specialisation. This is the single most complex infrastructure project to support the new vessels and was managed by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) in partnership with the main contractor, BAE Systems. More than 3 times the size of the Invincible class CVS they replace, the QEC make considerable demands on the naval base when alongside. Modern facilities were needed to supply electricity, water, waste disposal and sewage services as well as meet modern security, personnel accommodation and health & safety standards.
More than 60 meters longer and three times the displacement of their predecessors, the QEC carriers needed longer and stronger jetties, and able to cope with heavy loadings generated if the ships are subject to hurricane-force winds. The Princess Royal Jetty (PRJ) has been built to replace the old Sheer and Middle Slip jetties. 3000m² of jetty had to be reconstructed and extended over the old foundations which mostly dated back to the 1920s. PRJ was completed in March 2017 well ahead of the (slightly delayed) first arrival of HMS Queen Elizabeth and will be the primary berth for delivering panned maintenance periods. A second £30M project to extend the existing Victory and the former King Stairs Jetty was completed in October 2019. This provides another berth which will usually be used by the carrier at the higher state of readiness.
The 11-metre draught of the carriers necessitated major dredging work in the approach channel, inner harbour area and at the berths to make them deep and wide enough. 3 million cubic metres of clay, sand and gravel were excavated and more than 2,000 items were found in the process including sea mines, torpedoes, WWII bombs, 36 anchors and items of archaeological interest dating back centuries.
Fourteen 22-tonne steel towers which rise 30 metres from the seabed to provide a platform new navigational aids to mark the deep-water channel have been installed. The inbound lights are at the head of Portsmouth harbour and the outbound lights are in the harbour approaches off Southsea. Seen from the carrier, lights on the towers indicate if the ship is lined up in the channel, white is correct while too far to port shows red, too far to starboard shows green.
The QEC Centre of Specialisation covers 70,000 square meters and includes not just new jetties but several new buildings. The Illustrious Complex has amenities for the BAE Systems and sub-contractor engineering workforce with domestic, catering and recreational facilities. The centre has a 500-seat cafe and employee amenities such as lockers and showers.
Typical aircraft carrier maintenance periods can involve more than 1,000 personnel including an industrial workforce that can number up to 500 onboard the ships each day, sometimes working around the clock in shifts. During 2019, over 250,000 man-hours of work was completed on HMS Queen Elizabeth to fit 29 separate new capabilities to the ship as well as many other small maintenance and engineering tasks. Another 50 new capabilities are scheduled to be added to the two carriers in 2020 including everything from washing machines to flight deck landing aids. Administration of contractors is a complex job and BAE Systems has developed a mobile working system with each employee and contractor issued with dedicated phones or tablets to access work information and manage task lists.
The Forward Support Centre is the main logistics hub and includes a 7,000 square metre warehouse able to hold 15,000 pallets of medical, mail and naval stores under one roof. New water tanks hold 45,000 litres of drinking water available to supply the carriers before they sail. Situated on the north corner of PRJ, The Ark Royal Building is designed to accommodate up to 200 personnel awaiting transfer to the ship when at anchor or joining the ship alongside prior to deployment. There is also a conference room, exhibition space and rooms for visitors, VIPs and media.
As the carriers are such a high profile national asset, the site is especially well protected. To get access to the ships requires passing through the main naval base security and then through another checkpoint to get onto the PRJ or Victory Jetty. Armed MoD police patrol the area as well as the standard naval duty sentry on the gangways. When a carrier is alongside, at least two MoD police boats patrol the harbour adjacent to the ships. There is a network of CCTV cameras and probably other less obvious security measures are in place.
A new £12M Combined Heat and Power (CHP) facility has been constructed on the site of the existing boiler house on the east side of the dockyard. Three 4.5MW gas-powered generators will help meet the increased need for electrical power and supplement the supply from the National Grid. This highly efficient CHP plant should save the MoD around £4M per year in energy costs and cope with spikes in demand. The National Grid still supplies much of the power and a new 2.6 miles of cable has been installed between in Old Portsmouth and the jetty. Ships electrical systems operate on a frequency of 60Hz while the Grid runs at 50Hz. A new substation on the jetty has been built to house 50-60hz frequency converters and other elements of high voltage supply such as transformers and switchgear.
The complex issue of where the carriers will be dry-docked remains to be resolved but otherwise, the new centre of specialisation in Portsmouth is amongst the finest naval support facilities in the world. The project is a big vote of confidence in HMNB Portsmouth which was supposedly being considered for closure as recently as 2010. The base can look forward to an assured future and continuity of employment for a long time to come. Sensible investment in a spacious high-quality facility will allow the site to be developed further to meet the needs of the ships over their intended 50-year life span.
Wait, Portsmouth was actually considered for closure? First I’ve heard of it, how on Earth would that have even worked?
Devonport or Faslane, I’d understand being considered (although closing either would’ve been mad), but in 2010 (and today) Portsmouth was easily the most heavily used of the bases. Biggest flotilla, most important facilities, most historic value.
Clearly would have been bonkers but was considered as an option in the 2010 Defence Review.
https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/8180851.is-portsmouth-naval-base-earmarked-for-closure/
Great article, very interesting.
Also it is easy to just look at the glittering achievements which are the carriers, and overlook all the superb enablers such as these that make them actually operational and useful, which exist in the background out of the limelight, and were doubtless the results of a lot of expertise, hard work, and battles over need and money.
Well done to all responsible parties.
Back in the noughties, there was a school of thought that the Naval Estate was vastly oversized for what it had to support – which was interpreted as needing only two naval bases instead of three. Portsmouth was seen as particularly vulnerable – partly because it was not a nuclear support facility, but largely because large chunks of the base (the older heritage parts to the southeast) were seen as very expensive to maintain – and indeed had low occupancy. They were difficult to rent out as well, partly due to security access requirements and partly because commercial insurers convinced themselves there was a huge risk of ships exploding and hiked premiums accordingly.
One only needed to look at the size of the ships on the orderbook, the available wharf space at Guzz (and associated difficulties getting in) to realise that the idea of shutting Portsmouth was utter nonsense. But actually articulating that argument to the satisfaction of HMT took some time and effort. That was when every penny not going on Herrick needed justifying to the Nth degree.
The pendulum briefly swung back the other way and Guzz was looking a bit iffy after the decision to base the SSN at Faslane, the assumed redundancy of nuclear refits with core H and the poor state of the South and Morice yards. Thankfully sanity prevailed and the droggies, amphibs and tail-fitted frigates support relevant centres of expertise there.
Just goes to show how tight money was back then. Still is, but some of the more barking options are now discounted.
Given the massive running-down of the nuclear fleet during the 90s and 2000s, it’s almost comedic that a lack of nuclear facilities was seen as a bad thing.
At least we’ve reached a fairly logical distribution now. Having each base specialise in specific areas means less duplicated efforts.
Unless the absolutely mad suggestion that the paras and marines be unified into a single army commando unit goes through…
That was really interesting, and would love to see a full inventory of the 2,000 items collected during dredging. Thank you for the article.
Not a list but an interesting video air what had been found
Sorry forgot to add the link https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://m.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DYAvaGRWWCyM&ved=2ahUKEwja1JzSiprmAhUPYcAKHaLmAPQQo7QBMAJ6BAgAEAY&usg=AOvVaw37Z2zVoNiKlLdgRn7F80nL
Do all RN ships run at 60Hz or just the carriers?
Generally all shipping is 60Hz , its the same as US grid frequency, while the rest of the world grids mostly uses 50Hz. The RN was late to using AC power on ships , the post WW2 Daring class half the ships were still DC. It caused all sorts of problems for the carriers that were laid down in WW2 but lasted till the 70s. The modern equipment was all AC but the ships core systems werent.
There is now research into using DC again in shipping, one of the reasons is a ships multiple generators have to be harmonised at the 60Hz for AC , but a DC system means they can operate at variable frequency for for greater fuel efficiency at lower loads. I dont know if these options for commercial shipping could work for warships
Are your photo caption dates correct? The one dated July 19 is missing the big white building with a black roof that is shown in the photo dated March 19.
At last, the white knuckle journey to get these two sisters built as come to a close. The wilderness years between the demise of the Invincible Class and today, has been stressful for me. The prime cause of this fraught tension is due mainly to the sloppy machinery of government, and its irrational thought processes when it comes to military matters.
Unlike the critics of the new carriers, I have always believed we will bless the day the UK decided to build these vessels. Just as with the Hurrican and Spitfire, we will owe these two sisters an awful lot over the years of their service. Countless people will be saved from the ravages of climate change across the World, and the bullied and terrified protected by their actions. Sadly, they will be called to action and maybe stricken by the superweapons to come, but I’m sure they will endure, becoming the sweethearts of a grateful nation before they finally drop anchors.
When you look at the size of the cars in the foreground on the pictures you realise how huge Hms QE really is….Amazing
I thought you needed a LONDON bus or an Olympic swimming pool to understand the size of the QEC?
Still no dry dock to take the carriers apart from The Firth of Forth. Work on it RN.