Today the USS Harry S Truman, flagship of US Navy’s Carrier Strike Group 8 came to anchor in the Solent off Gosport for a 5-day visit. We went on board and were able to speak with senior officers about their mission and relationship with the Royal Navy.
Unlike the USS George H W Bush which visited the UK last July after operations in the Gulf, the Truman’s mission is very different. This follows the principles of the new US ‘National Defense Strategy’ where deployments are strategically predictable but operationally unpredictable.
The strike group commander, Rear Admiral Eugene ‘Gene’ Black, a surface warfare specialist with destroyer and cruiser commands under his belt, confirmed to us that when his Strike Group originally deployed, back in April 2018, he had planned to proceed through the Mediterranean and operate there for a short time before continuing on to the Gulf, to operate as part of the US 5th Fleet.
Instead, he received orders to operate in the Eastern Med for longer before returning to the States early. After just over a month alongside in Norfolk, as a ‘working port visit’, conducting limited maintenance while remaining 100% operationally available, at 48 hours notice, she then departed for the second part of the deployment. This involved her working in the North Atlantic, in the new US 2nd Fleet area of operations, conducting dual-carrier operations in company with the USS Abraham Lincoln and Anti-Submarine exercises with the Royal Canadian Navy, before heading north east towards Iceland, then down through the North Sea to Portsmouth.
Admiral Black was asked about HMS Queen Elizabeth and told us that he was “absolutely thrilled to have the Royal Navy back in the fixed-wing aviation business”. Having operated with the RN many times he said they were “absolute professionals… and great to have the Royal Navy sailing alongside the US Navy”. Despite comments from the US president, the deployment is intended to reassure Europeans of the US commitment to NATO. The group has already hosted visitors from Poland, Lithuania, Sweden and Norway.
When probed about the Russian threat the Admiral would not be drawn. He described the Russians as “professional mariners and good aviators but I do not lose sleep over them”. He was certainly being diplomatic, as the extended presence of a USN carrier in the North Atlantic and around Europe, together with the re-establishment of the 2nd Fleet is in direct response to Russian naval activity. He then went on to point out that as we walked around the ship we would see a lot of combat power and that power, when matched with the capabilities of HMS Queen Elizabeth and other NATO forces, meant he was very comfortable that he could operate where he wished and when he wished.
Confirming all US stereotypes about English weather, the commanding officer was interviewed in pouring rain on the flight deck. Captain Nicholas ‘Nick’ Dienna, a former TOPGUN instructor with considerable naval aviation and ship command experience described how much he and his crew were looking forward to their long weekend in Portsmouth. Dienna highlighted how many of the customs and traditions of the US Navy had their origins from the Royal Navy. He confirmed that the 100,000 ton Truman currently had over 75 aircraft embarked, from 9 squadrons, and over 5,000 sailors onboard (and a branch of Starbucks).
Touring the Truman, it is apparent the Nimitz Class are of a very different generation to the HMS Queen Elizabeth Class. Manpower intensive, complicated but rugged, the firepower of the ship, it’s embarked air squadrons and escorts are immense. Visitors to the ship were treated with customary warmth and hospitality by a crew pleased to be visiting the UK and especially happy that the Royal Navy was back in the fixed-wing aviation business.
Im amazed she can’t dock in portsmouth, or can she? with all the dredging for the QE class and also the QEs seem to fit in ok, The difference I don’t think is that substantial, what is the draft difference between the QEs and the Nimitz classes?
Doesn’t it also have to do with her being nuclear powered?
I was wondering that but it’s not as of the UK is anti nuclear, we have a lot of subs that are nuclear powered, I dont see why it’s a problem, and I’m sure there have been nuclear subs in Portsmouth before.
The Queen Elizabeth Class are 70,000 tonnes while the Nimitz class are about 30% larger at more than 100,000 tonnes. Despite the dredging for the QEC, Portsmouth harbour entrance is too narrow to admit the US carriers. Portsmouth does have a “Z berth” – ie certified for nuclear vessels (Although nuclear submarines are very rare visitors these days ) but unclear if the new Princess Royal Jetty built for the carriers is certified for nuclear vessels.
Arent the Nimitz class only a few feet wider in the hull? All in all, I think it is what they are used to and more convenient and easier to do in all fairness. SS Normandie never docked at Southampton etc…
QE are 36ft and
Nimitz are 37ft draught. I thought she would fit in as well. I mean she could probable sail in but could she turn round to come out again.
Don’t know why the truman didn’t go into Milford Haven. U get super tankers twice her size in there.
Portsmouth v Milford Haven I wonder why lol
Wonderful piece and great pictures of the Truman. I have no doubt Captain Dienna is sincere in his comments regarding the Royal Navy since most of our technology was developed by the RN. Also, Admiral Black’s comments are much appreciated. I feel the US Navy has always counted on and appreciates the RN having their back. Let’s hope US service men and women are not too rowdy when visiting Portsmouth. I enjoyed the stories of RN sailors being arrested in Florida for behavior that is as old seafaring itself. Glad to see the RN with naval aviation once again.
I
These ships are impressive but as the new Truman ships, they look dated. Just an observation, but the latest US carriers are not, but look it. They look old, but how far can you go? Still brilliant ships