The latest iteration of NATO multi-national exercise Joint Warrior is currently underway. We went aboard the RN Fleet Flagship, HMS Albion, at sea off the Scottish coast and spoke with the commanders of the amphibious phase of the exercise.
HMS Albion returned from a 9-month deployment in November which included a major amphibious exercise Saif Sareea 3. When she sailed for the deployment there were considerable fears for the future of UK amphibious forces with the possibility that HMS Albion and Bulwark would be axed along with a reduction in the number of Royal Marines. The Defence Secretary subsequently won that fight with the Treasury and has enthusiastically embraced plans to develop the capability. Commodore James Parkin is Commander Amphibious Task Group (COMATG), one of just three RN one-star level commanders that deploy to sea. For Joint Warrior, he was joined by another one-star, Brigadier Matt Jackson, Commander of 3 Commando Brigade, responsible for the land-based operations. (The third deployable one-star is Commander United Kingdom Carrier Strike Group, (COMUKCSG), currently Cdre Mike Utley.)
The task group commanded by Parkin is just one of 9 groups within Joint Warrior. Under his command are two of the Standing NATO Maritime Groups, his flagship HMS Albion and RFA Lyme Bay with an embarked force of Dutch Marines. The escort vessels of the SNMG1 are tasked to protect the landing forces while the mine hunters of SNMCG1 clear routes for amphibious forces. There is another Dutch amphibious group and the Danish Navy are commanding the adversary task group. For this phase of the exercise, HMS Defender was providing air defence and HMS Kent was providing anti-submarine protection for the amphibious ships and MCMVs. Dutch Marines and Royal Marines are working as an integrated landing force.
Joint Warrior (JW 19-1) includes 13 NATO nations and Australia, involving 10,000 military personnel, 54 warships and 5 submarines. Besides being the host and the Joint Tactical Exercise Planning Staff (JTEPS) running the exercise from Faslane, Royal Navy participation is substantial. (Although some of the vessels that had originally been assigned to the ATG were tasked elsewhere at the last minute, HMS Diamond and RFA Argus were withdrawn).
The Scottish coast is a particularly good place to train in amphibious operations with rapid changes in weather in sea states that constantly challenge people and equipment. The twice-yearly Joint Warrior series of exercises have been running for many years, before that known as the Joint Maritime Course (JMC) which date back to the 1950s. The Commodore explained the value of these exercises: “The UK has always felt that by operating with allies and partners it makes us better but also helps bring everyone else up at the same time. It does not matter how good you are at independent operations, you are always limited when you are on your own. Smaller exercises increase interoperability but Joint Warrior is about integration, meshing in together, beyond just learning each other’s communications and procedures. The place where the Land, Air and Sea meet is in the Littoral space where it’s my job to deliver effects but we also work in the cyber/electromagnetic and space domains. We need to practice fighting in all 5 domains with other NATO members.”
There are 4 NATO Standing Maritime Groups that are at immediate notice and already exist. Besides that, there is the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force (VJTF) established in 2014. This ‘spearhead force’ is able to react to threats against NATO sovereignty and is built around a land brigade of about 5,000 troops, supported by air, naval and special forces units. At the next level of readiness are the Initial Follow on Forces Groups (IFFG). For 2019 Parkin is designated commander for the Maritime IFFG. Brigadier Jackson is the commander of the IFFG maritime landing force and they would be tasked by the NATO Joint Force Commander in the event of a crisis. This is part of the NATO Response Force (NRF) which he describes as the “break glass in case of emergency force”. NATO is very aware it’s strength lies not just in the size of the forces available, but their ability to work effectively together, a primary reason for training in complex environments like Joint Warrior. A NATO validation team was due to arrive on HMS Albion to test COMATG in this role.
There is a heavy reliance on space-based information and COMATG gets a twice-daily space weather forecast that predicts the impacts solar flare activity might have on how they operate. A simulated cyber attack on the task group was conducted early in the exercise to test the resistance of systems and how to cope if IT systems are compromised. NATO is working hard in this area learning from each other, eventually, one nation is likely to be chosen to lead as the ‘best practice’ example for others to follow.
Both Parkin and Jackson were keen to highlight how amphibious operations are evolving. There is a misconception that the LPDs and their landing craft would be used to storm well-defended beaches in a replay of a WWII D-Day type operation, as depicted in ‘Saving Private Ryan’. Today’s precision weapons and far smaller numbers preclude this kind of very high-risk type of assault. Modern amphibious forces are intended to create uncertainty in an enemy that may have a considerable length of coastline to defend. Attacking the enemy where they are weak, striking unannounced at the time and place of your choosing are the great strengths of this kind of force. Beach landings are only one part of the toolkit, helicopters can deliver troops far inland and commando-trained forces can scale cliffs and operate in all kinds of terrain and extremes of climates. HMS Albion has been described as the “Swiss Army Knife” of the RN, reflecting the variety of roles that can be delivered by amphibious platforms. Able to conduct humanitarian aid, disaster relief and civilian evacuations operations through to complex assault operations, the sense in keeping and improving this capability is obvious.
Parkin observed “many of the ship’s company were born in the 21st Century and are ‘digital natives’, able to think and adapt in new ways… The RN is in something of a new era with an increasingly modern fleet, F-35 and the new Littoral Strike Group being set up differently from the ATG… It’s an exciting time to be a naval officer”
Although the RN has very few unmanned, autonomous or AI systems deployed operationally right now, there is a clear intention to embrace these developments that will be increasingly important in all forms of warfare. Exercise Commando Warrior involving QinetiQ and 1AGRM, supported by 40 Commando was held recently in the Plymouth area. This was the first trial integrating technology for the Future Commando Force. Autonomous air, surface and ground sensors delivered fused information to a remote headquarters and to ground commanders to assist with decision-making allowing greater precision and reduced risk.
Building on the training experience from Joint Warrior, COMATG will again fly his flag in HMS Albion leading the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) of around 20 warships from eight European nations to the Baltic Sea for exercise Baltic Protector in May of this year.
Very informative article, nice job.
Axing Albion and Bulwark would be sheer lunacy.
I guess Argus isn’t ready yet after it’s refit. But any indication as to why HMS Diamond was sent back to Devonport?
Probably to have its engines ripped out and replaced as per the reliability issues they had. The Type 45s were due for the refit this year IIRC
Can’t comment on Argus’ precise material state but the implication was she was withdrawn for operational reasons. Diamond is based in Portsmouth – a brief visit to Devonport before deploying again.
The T45s are having their engines upgraded at Cammell Laird in Birkenhead in a rolling programme over several years, with HMS Daring starting shortly. Despite the engine issues the T45s are operating almost normally with 4 of them active right now.
Ahhhh ty for the info 😊 I was just guessing 😉
The needs of civilians need to be balanced with the need for large scale war games. Particularly as the Scottish people effectively have one foot out of the UK already and with Brexit tensions (62% voted to remain but are being dragged out). It seems unnecessarily provocative to hold such operations north of the border. Such operations might have been held in sparsely populated Scandinavia.
I understand that the Joint Warrior war games have caused disruption to life in the effected parts of Scotland such as intruding on conservation areas and wildlife, GPS jamming affecting marine traffic and airspace restrictions affecting international flights being cancelled over the Western Isles.
I hope the MOD has a compensation fund for anyone affected.
What a load of nonsense.
Rick, tell that to SNP MP Angus MacNeil who missed a crucial Brexit vote in the House of Commons due to a last minute cancellation of his flight due to airspace restrictions over the Western Isles.
We need to consider real life consequences of military activity rather than the mutual backslapping and male bonding over militaria evident here.
As someone who has experience in the Airspace coordination measures and NOTAM systems used in JW, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is the Airline trying to deflect blame for their mistakes.
The flight plan was not affected the restrictions were for high altitude .
The company plane was grounded due to an engine issue.
By blaming the MoD they are trying to wiggle out of paying compensation.
That story was political chuff, and it’s been acknowledged so by those involved, and you are repeating the admitted lies…how sad, you really need to stop trolling both this site and the UK defence journal, you sad bell-end.
Airborne, has the MP involved retracted his statement?
As for the rest, I have as much right as anyone to post where I will. As posters can see, it’s you who is launching personal attacks and trolling here. You made two posts, neither of which addresses in any way the topic under discussion.
I know that my posts are unpopular and will get down voted. However, this has more to do with the right wing echo chambers that military sites seem to attract rather than what I write or the opinions I hold. As you can see demonstrated here by posters who agree with some of the things I wrote.
Your posts aren’t unpopular,they just do not have any subject matter knowledge or experience, and it does show every time you type son. And other posters on occasion agree with you as they are unaware of your troll like agenda. Do they know you also troll the UK defence journal, with similar piffle and child like attempts at baiting people, I do like a good informed cut and debate but I also recognise a troll like bell-end and respond in kind.
Yes my posts TO YOU may not address the topic, but they do address your child like behaviour. And I can also see you do not like to be baited in kind, therefore it will continue son. Next?
I believe I read that the restrictions to airspace were briefed in advance. Not the MoD fault his airline failed to take appropriate action to reschedule and notify passengers..
They are not being “dragged out”, they are being liberated from an anti-democratic, supra-nationalist organisation with a failing economic program. The Scots can not be an independent nation in the EU; nobody can. It is a contradiction that the SNP ideologist wilfully deny. And if they leave the UK (a union they have benefitted from far more than the EU), they will loose their shipbuilding contracts.
The Scots are ignored in London & Brussels, right now the Brussels faceless bureaucrats
are looking more competent than their Westminster counterparts.
All pointless anyway, Italy shows the way, going for Chinese Colonial Status.
What a load of tripe. LIBERATED??? what the hell are you on about, as for failing economic program in also not sure what the hell you are on about. The EU has resulted in the reemergence of French British and German economies since the 70s and has been Britain’s largest source of inverstment in the last ten years.
I’m not trying to make this political and I disagree mostly with the Scottish point but don’t make pathetic nonsensical accusations with no base. such a gammon
You are a top class bell-end with such a pathetic existence you troll military sites to cry, weep, waffle and troll. Get a life you piss soaked Gary Glitter fan.
Is not northern Scotland sparsely populated also?
Jesus, look at this lot!I got a warning for arguing that the fleet carrier programme with no fleet was a bad idea!
Anyway,back to the subject, how can I beat it into a lot of the gun obsessed commentators here that the total budget ship is £250 million and the cost of a mk 45 gun is £60 million?The abitary budget has taken precedence over military need, its not possible to build anything other than a very expensive OPV or a death trap with the budget provided.
Oops,replied to the wrong article!Not that I’m wrong.
But what is the cost of porting across a 4.5 Mk 8 ?