On 1st January 2017 the MoD published a press release that proclaimed it would be “the year of the Royal Navy”. Ministers may have come to regret such a bold statement but it certainly helped shine a spotlight on the service during turbulent times. Here we review some of the highlights and some of the difficulties the RN has experienced this year.
January
It was revealed in a leak to the press that there had been a failed Trident missile test launch during the Demonstration and Shakedown Operation (
February
The Sun newspaper published a story claiming all seven of the RN’s attack submarines (SSNs) were alongside either in refit or experiencing material defects. This was certainly the case for a short period at the start of the year and represented a very serious weakening of UK defence, symptomatic of ageing Trafalgar class boats and problems with the new Astute boats. The Daily Express went a step further claiming HMS Trenchant would never sail again and the Trafalgar class boats had terminal defects that would end their careers. Fortunately, this was proved to be total nonsense and HMS Trenchant has been at sea for much of this year. The Sea Venom light anti-ship missile successfully completed its next round of trials on the way to being in RN service by 2020.
March
First, of the batch II river class OPVs, HMS Forth was formally named at a ceremony in Scotstoun, Glasgow. The Lynx Mk 8 Helicopter and the Sea Suka missile went out of service, leaving the RN with no light anti-shipping missile for two years. The RN conducted their first Exercise “Information Warrior” (alongside the regular Ex Joint Warrior) and tested naval cyber and AI capabilities.
April
The RN announced it was reducing the Royal Marines by 200 men in order to free up funding for more sailors while 42 Commando was being downgraded in size and capability. This was the first indication that amphibious forces were the only place left to go for the RN to make cuts as it was being squeezed in the funding crisis. The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee finally confirmed the ugly rumours that there exists at least a £10 billion ‘black hole’ in funding for the MoDs equipment programme. On appeal, Royal Marine Sergeant, Alexander Blackman was cleared of committing murder during deployment in Afghanistan during 2011 and was finally freed, after serving 3 years in prison.
The MoD had stated in January that the keel for the 7th Astute class (HMS Ajax?) would be laid in 2017 but this has not happened. Although some steel has been cut, it would appear the delays to boats 4-6 means there is not space or manpower available to lay the keel of boat 7.
May
HMS Daring returned after a successful 9-month deployment in the heat of the Persian Gulf confounding the critics who claim Type 45 always break down in in hot weather. On return Daring went into long-term lay up as a harbour training ship, replacing HMS Dauntless which has been in a similar state for the last 2 years.
June
Defence was largely given low priority by politicians and media in the General Election campaign. The Tories just hung on to remain in government but in a chaotic and much-weakened state. However, the same ministerial team remained in place at the MoD and continuity in defence policy seemed likely. The new government began its “National Security Capability Review” which was supposed to be a low key assessment of UK security across government departments, rather than a full defence scale review. HMS Queen Elizabeth sailed from Rosyth to begin sea trials. A landmark moment for the RN and the progress of this great ship which, for better or worse, would dominate media coverage of the navy for the rest of the year.
July
The US Navy kindly lent the USS George H W Bush to the RN for 2 weeks to conduct Exercise Saxon Warrior to help regenerate carrier battle group command skills. HMS Queen Elizabeth’s sea trials were interrupted by a propeller shaft issue which was corrected during 2 weeks alongside in Invergordon, amid much media speculation. After a gestation period for the new frigate programme of more than 20 years, steel was finally cut for HMS Glasgow, the first type 26 Frigate. It was subsequently announced the 3rd ship in the initial batch of 3 will be named HMS Belfast. HMS Torbay was decommissioned after 32 years of outstanding service, reducing the SSN force to just 6 boats until HMS Audacious commissions.
August
HMS Forth sailed from Glasgow to begin contractors sea trials. 3rd of the 4 Tide class tankers, RFA Tidesurge was officially named in South Korea. HMS Ocean sailed for her final deployment to lead a NATO group in the Mediterranean.
September
When Hurricane Irma hit the Caribbean, RFA Mounts Bay was already in the region and prepared to assist. The scale of the damage demanded a major response from UK armed forces in the form of Operation Ruman. HMS Ocean was hurriedly re-tasked to sail from the Eastern Mediterranean to store in Gibraltar and cross the Atlantic to assist. The humanitarian aid effort across the Caribbean led by the RN was a demonstration of the flexibility and utility of naval forces and did a great deal to alleviate suffering in the British dependencies. The outline specification for the Type 31e frigate was issued by the RN with a very low budget set at £250M per ship. The second carrier, HMS Prince of Wales was formally named at a ceremony in Rosyth. It was revealed that minehunters HMS Atherstone and Quorn would not complete the refits that they had begun and would be decommissioned early as a cost and manpower saving measure. The RN sensibly decided to defer the previously planned retirement of its semi-obsolete Harpoon anti-ship missiles until 2020, pending a replacement. The 2nd MARS Tanker built in South Korea, RFA Tidesurge arrived in Falmouth for fitting out with military equipment. Rear Admiral Alex Burton, Commander UK Maritime Forces handed in his resignation, ostensibly in protest at the possible plan to axe HMS Albion, Bulwark and large numbers of Royal Marines. Leaked proposals to scale back UK amphibious capability generated enormous controversy and have cast a long shadow of the “year of the Royal Navy”.
October
HMS Queen Elizabeth departed Portsmouth for part 2 sea trials off the Cornish coast which were conducted successfully over a 3 week period in very benign weather. 2nd OPV HMS Medway was formally named at a ceremony in Glasgow. At Barrow a ceremony was held for the Defence Secretary to start the first steel cutting for the new Trident successor submarine, which it was announced will be named HMS Dreadnought.
November
Michael Fallon resigned suddenly amidst a scandal about his personal conduct and was replaced by the former chief whip, Gavin Williamson. The NAO published a report which revealed the growing extent of cannibalisation of stores and spare parts across the RN. In a relatively low key ceremony, the Prince of Wales opened the new Naval Support Facility (NSF) HMS Juffair in Bahrain which will greatly improve alongside support for RN vessels deployed in the Gulf region. After covering for HMS Ocean doing NATO duty in the Mediterranean, HMS Diamond was forced to return home from her planned Gulf deployment with a serious propellor shaft problem. The lack of alternative vessels to cover this kind of contingency left the RN with no major warship East of Suez for the first time in living memory. RFA Tidespring was dedicated into the fleet at a ceremony in Portsmouth. The 4 new tankers will be fantastic additions to the RFA and are designed specifically to refuel the aircraft carriers. RN sailors provided the guard at Royal residences in London for the first time in 400 years.
December
HMS Queen Elizabeth was commissioned in the presence of Her Majesty – another landmark moment and a demonstration of the RN’s enduring ability to excel in the organisation and presentation of ceremonial events. Just a week later, more negativity and disinformation about the carrier project was generated by the Sun newspaper grossly exaggerating the significance of a minor leak on a stern seal of HMS Queen Elizabeth. HMS Prince of Wales was floated out of the basin in Rosyth to begin fitting out with sea trails scheduled for mid-2019.
The adventures of Gavin
In the two months Gavin Williamson has been defence secretary there has never been a dull moment. The new man had no previous track record of interest in defence matters and many perceive him as a clever and ambitious schemer using the post as a stepping stone to the Tory leadership. However, rather than continuing the bland and conformist approach of Michael Fallon, he has given the impression that he will fight for the department. Of the commitment to 2% GDP spending on defence, he said : “I’ve always seen 2% as base, not a ceiling”. It was reported he has demanded significantly more money from the Treasury and even had a physical altercation with the Chancellor of the Exchequer in Westminster. He also barred Philip Hammond from using RAF transport aircraft until the Treasury paid money owed. On British Jahdis who had gone to fight for ISIS he said they “should be shot, bombed or banned from coming home”. He blocked the Army’s plan to ditch their strapline “Be the Best” because their hired consultants had deemed it “too elitist”. Speaking on Russian warships and submarines operating close to UK territorial waters he said: “I will not hesitate in defending our waters or tolerate any form of aggression”. One could interpret his statements as a carefully stage-managed attempt to get attention and appeal to a section of disenchanted Tory voters. A less cynical view is that he has listened to the procession of experts warning about the sorry and dangerous state of UK defence and he is determined to actually do something about it. The appointment of the new defence secretary has been used as a reason to extend the ongoing “defence review” into 2018. There is greater public opposition and awareness about further defence cuts than there was in 2010 and at least 20 Tory MPs are likely to rebel against the government if new funding is not forthcoming.
Still doing the business?
There is no doubt that the RN is in a poor state in many ways but there remains much to be positive about. As the summary above shows, this year has been one of contrasts. New equipment has reached important milestones on its way to join the fleet but at the same time manpower shortages, not enough ships and further possible cuts continue to blight the service.
A little lost amongst the focus on equipment is the day to day business of the RN. The service is just about able to manage the tasks mandated by government and has achieved a great deal in protecting the nation’s interests in 2017. As an example, on 22nd November 2017 the RN had 32 ships and submarines either overseas or on operations (including RFAs but not including P2000 boats) and around 8,000 people actively deployed. (Reflecting the growing concern about Russia, the majority of these vessels were deployed in European or northern waters.) At Christmas, the numbers deployed were approximately half that of November, mainly because for the sake of morale, the RN is determined to give leave to as many of its people as possible over the holiday period.
Decisions that will be taken in Westminster in the early part of 2018 will determine if the RN will have a more stable future or must endure yet further reduction and over-stretch.
This is all about the intransigence of Philip Hammond Chancellor of the Exchequer. He is an ex -Defence Secretary and should know better than to squeeze the life out of the armed forces in general and the Royal Navy in particular. He left his post as Defence Secretary, despite spin saying he had fixed the defence budget shortfall; with a huge deficit. In other words he misled the Nation and the House of Commons. If he doesn’t put it right let’s hope he has time in the New Year to reflect on this from the Back Benches.
So far, i think that Gavin Williamson has done a good job. As long as he fights for his department, not just in front of everybody, but behind the scenes too, there is a fighting chance that the MoD’s finances could become less of a problem and that could allow more money to flow into the RN. One thing i cant get my head around is the decommissioning of HMS Ocean with no replacement!! Our capability will be cut dramatically.
I completely concur with you regarding HMS Ocean. As you point out, there is no replacement for her.
The second point that galls me is that Ocean is only 20 years old.
The equivalent class of ship in the USN is built to serve 30-35 years before it is paid out.
Yes that’s right, and those USN ships are nearly double in size and number!!
The issue is not that Ocean is being decommissioned but she is going with no replacement!
You need to rember she was built on the cheap originally to bolster the fleet (the cost of a type 23 I think) but built on commercial lines rather than Royal Navy standards and with a life of only 20 years.
OK, thanks. I didnt realise that. The ideal situation would be several ships similar to the Juan Carlos/Canberra class, as these have the capability for MBT’s as well as fixed wing aircraft.
The change of a new defence Secretary is long overdue. And first impression is good . But as usual only time will tell if Gavin Williamson is the real deal.
yeah, i guess your right. Its a good first impression anyway, so we should be positive and look on to the future.
The clutching at straws thread. 6 ships had to be docked to provide 250 guards at Buckingham Palace. Major success for navy!
I see the shortage of Naval staff has been reduced to only 720 openings. It was interesting to note the US Navy has similar issues on a larger scale, some 14000 openings. The shortage has become so acute that sailors are working very long hours (100 hour weeks) and experiencing fatigue. Two of the accidents by the 7th fleet in the Pacific have been at least partially attributed to crew fatigue. This is something the RN should not take lightly and ensure their ships are fully manned.
I have commented on here before with my experiences of joining the RN, albeit as an officer (so this is not properly representative granted). However, simply providing the dwindling number of sailors, with a proper salary will do wonders for recruitment. At the very least it needs to be competitive with the private sectors. Currently, it simply is not. I think we all have suggestions for where that money may come from.
I was lucky enough to visit Portsmouth over the hols when all the fleet was in. We took a harbour tour and QE looked magnificent under a brilliant blue sky, but seeing it all in one place as I went round I thought – jeeeze, there really isn’t much is there.
Then as if he ‘d been reading my mind, my 10 year old son said ‘Dad, is that it? Is that all the ships we have?’
I explained, we have subs, RAS & OPVs but we looked at each other and both knew I was putting on a brave face.
The T-23s looked jaded and from another era, Argus going to, it really brought it home to me how thin it all is and what a dereliction of duty by both parties, defence has become.
On a lighter note, I highly recommend a day out at Portsmouth Historic dockyard. It was a three and half our drive each way but totally worth it.
To be honest with you, i think things will get worse before they get better. The T-23’s are very old and compared with frigates from other countries, they look tired and cluttered. I am not knocking their capabilities though – they have done us proud over the years. Just pray for the restoration of the Navy and the Royal Marines. I hate the thought of cutting the Royal Marines capability – hundreds of years of tradition and fighting elitism being cut down!:( For many people across the world, the armed forces are the face of Britain and its might, and , being very patriotic, I hate the thought of that might being even slightly diminished.
Agreed, Britain garners her prestige from two institutions, the military and the monarchy. If one or both take a hit, Britain is diminished as a country.
Rick, I literally burst out laughing at your post.
Britain garners more prestige from the English language, having the mother of Parliaments, observing the rule of law (at least before the Brexit shenanigans) and creating the NHS.
Compare this to our underfunded (according to the SavetheRN crowd here, at least) and undermanned armed forces or the scandal hit monarchy z lister parasitic celebs (have Beatrice and Eugenia ever done a days work rather than going in a dozen holidays a year subsidised by the UK taxpayer)?
So what part of Brexit is not observing the rule of law. I am honestly curious as to what you think is illegal?
Paul, firstly the whole Gina Miller case on the powers of the executive. Very third world how the government tried to bulldoze their view on triggering Brexit processes rather than going through parliament.
Also, in terms of the post Brexit relationship between the UK and EU judiciary and laws, the independence of judges taking political considerations into account is a very real problem. Also questions of jurisdiction. Will laws apply in the UK and across the continent?
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/law/2017/nov/21/rule-of-lawin-uk-at-risk-after-brexit-says-former-supreme-court-president
You have got really quite confused and way off topic.
The Judiciary will of course remain independent, UK laws will be made and implemented but UK will be independent and the RN will remain British.
You made a memory for your son, and that made it all worthwhile.
We all want a strong and stable United Kingdom.
The central issue on defence is finance.
We can only have a strong and stable country if we are at peace at home. This means reducing inequality and giving all groups in society a stake in the future. We are the second most unequal society in the OECD. One major way for the government to reduce inequality is for smart investment in social welfare, health and education. The last election result reinforces the fact that the electorate want to see more economic justice.
Therefore significant increases in defence spending will go against the prevailing consensus amongst politicians across the divide and the electorate. There is also the question of where any increases will come from. Who wants to see their local A&E close down because the Royal Navy wants a new frigate to police the Gulf and Middle East? The aid budget is increasing Britain’s ‘soft power’ abroad and money better spent than on ‘hard power’ in defence that we are unlikely to utilise.
Add in the economic cost of Brexit (and referendum promises of £350 million extra spending on the NHS per week) and in fact a further reduction, rather than an increase, in defence procurement would seem to be justified.
Soft Power is great until you actually need to do something. Next year if the hurricane season is the same or worse than this we will no longer have HMS Ocean to assist. But we will have the option to send HMS Albiin or HMS Bulwark (hopefully they will survive the cuts) in extremis we could send HMS Queen Elizabeth. This ability to deploy at short notice requires hadware and more importantly well trained people. Soft Power only goes so far. Soft Power did not fix the issues in Sierra Leone. That required the application of hardpower. The world is a dangerous place.
Agreed. Too many people confuse the two. We are investing far too much in soft and not enough in hard.
Money doesn’t grow on trees. This a lesson the left doesn’t seem to understand after all these years. Unless we have a successful economy you don’t have anything, you have poverty, inequality and hopelessness.
Defence spend can be positive in many ways. Employing people in the military both directly and indirectly is re-distributive provided its carefully thought through. You can see it as further education for the participants, especially when they are involved in advanced tech. It can also bring aid to many parts of the world after disaster. The RN supported by the RAF was able to bring rapid aid in the wake of the Typhoon in the Philippines and likewise this year in the Caribbean following the Hurricanes.
We cant do that or much else if we pursue Mr Ahmed’s Coastal Navy (sabotage) dream.
Naturally we also need strong hardpower as anyone who has studied these things will be aware.
Exactly, spot on. Defence spending has a lot of knock-on impacts sustaining thousands of jobs across the UK. OK, there are many other ways in which to spend the budget on, but defence is one of the key areas.
As you point out, the RN and RAF made a vital contribution to restoration of the islands swept by hurricanes and storms…..the whole world was watching this……if we didn’t have a half decent navy we wouldn’t have been able to provide much help and we may have had to rely on other European nations or America.
Mr Ahmed doesn’t seem to have a clue what he is on about – I suggest a little research to save you the embarrassment of adjustment and correction by other, learned people on this site!
The lefts answer to everything, shovel in more money for “social welfare, health and education.”
It’s unfortunate that the Tories only look at the bottom line balance.
The armed forces don’t show a profit nor should they.
The cap on forces pay and the fact that a members of the armed forces can be made redundant with no union representation like any outher employees make the armed forces less attractive positions.
In the next couple of years the government will need to make some proper investment in our armed forces.
They need to make a new no compolsury redudency promise to members of the armed forces.
The Blackman case was an interesting one for me personally.
When I first heard about the Al Blackman story and witnessing the subsequent public out-cry and appeals for the Sergeant to be released I believed he was someone who had been made a scapegoat. I do still believe he was hung out to dry.
Around November 2016, I began a Military Ethics course via the Defence Academy. One of the major case studies was Al Blackman, the RM Sergeant who fired a 9mm round into the chest of a Taliban fighter who was lying seriously wounded after an Apache WAH-64D had struck him with 30mm. It should be noted that the unit did attempt medical care of the fighter.
The course was lead by military officers, one of which had been Al Blackman’s CO at one point in his career.
They explained how there had been an ethical breakdown, how the extreme pressures and possible mental weaknesses had contributed to a unit that should not have been out in the field, and how Sgt Blackman, an exemplary soldier, simply ‘lost it’ for a ‘moment’, and that moment cost him his career and liberty.
The case study concluded that he did wrong and was jailed as a result of breaking the ethical principles of the UK Armed Forces.
Its not easy to understand what went on in that compound, especially if you haven’t been in that situation yourself. A lot of people were campaigning for and against Sgt Blackman without fully understanding the situation.
I think that the people that put Sgt Blackman in that position should have been in the dock with him – especially “Tone” Bliar.
Agree with you Commander X. See our article on a complex case (from 2014):
https://www.navylookout.com/marine-a-can-there-be-justice-and-mercy/